The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacterial sorption of heavy metals
Open accessAbstract
Four bacteria, Bacillus cereus, B. subtilis, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, were examined for the ability to remove Ag+, Cd2+, Cu2+, and La3+ from solution by batch equilibration methods. Cd and Cu sorption over the concentration range 0.001 to 1 mM was described by Freundlich isotherms. At 1 mM concentrations of both Cd2+ and Cu2+, P. aeruginosa and B. cereus were the most and least efficient at metal removal, respectively. Freundlich K constants indicated that E. coli was most efficient at Cd2+ removal and B. subtilis removed the most Cu2+. Removal of Ag+ from solution by bacteria was very efficient; an average of 89% of the total Ag+ was removed from the 1 mM solution, while only 12, 29, and 27% of the total Cd2+, Cu2+, and La3+, respectively, were sorbed from 1 mM solutions. Electron microscopy indicated that La3+ accumulated at the cell surface as needlelike, crystalline precipitates. Silver precipitated as discrete colloidal aggregates at the cell surface and occasionally in the cytoplasm. Neither Cd2+ nor Cu2+ provided enough electron scattering to identify the location of sorption. The affinity series for bacterial removal of these metals decreased in the order Ag greater than La greater than Cu greater than Cd. The results indicate that bacterial cells are capable of binding large quantities of different metals. Adsorption equations may be useful for describing bacterium-metal interactions with metals such as Cd and Cu; however, this approach may not be adequate when precipitation of metals occurs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
(2014) · doi:10.1201/b17118 · Cited by 57,706
Cited by
Antimicrobial activity of metals: mechanisms, molecular targets and applications
Lemire, J. A., Harrison, J. J., & Turner, R. J. (2013) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3028 · Cited by 2,746
Microbial and plant derived biomass for removal of heavy metals from wastewater
Ahluwalia, S. S., & Goyal, D. (2007) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2005.12.006 · Cited by 1,586
Gadd, G. M. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1002/jctb.1999 · Cited by 1,287
Lovley, D. R. (1993) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.mi.47.100193.001403 · Cited by 1,021
A chemical equilibrium model for metal adsorption onto bacterial surfaces
Fein, J. B., Daughney, C. J., Yee, N., & Davis, T. A. (1997) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0016-7037(97)00166-x · Cited by 709
Metadata
- Authors
- Mullen, M. D., Wolf, D. C., Ferris, F. G., Beveridge, T. J., Flemming, C. A., & Bailey, G. W.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1989-12
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3143-3149
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1608215808
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial sorption of heavy metals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.55.12.3143-3149.1989
- The paper
- Mullen, M. D., Wolf, D. C., Ferris, F. G., Beveridge, T. J., Flemming, C. A., & Bailey, G. W. (1989). Bacterial sorption of heavy metals. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.55.12.3143-3149.1989
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.