The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of cellulose fine structure on kinetics of its digestion by mixed ruminal microorganisms in vitro
Open accessAbstract
The digestion kinetics of a variety of pure celluloses were examined by using an in vitro assay employing mixed ruminal microflora and a modified detergent extraction procedure to recover residual cellulose. Digestion of all of the celluloses was described by a discontinuous first-order rate equation to yield digestion rate constants and discrete lag times. These kinetic parameters were compared with the relative crystallinity indices and estimated accessible surface areas of the celluloses. For type I celluloses having similar crystallinities and simple nonaggregating particle morphologies, the fermentation rate constants displayed a strong positive correlation (r2 = 0.978) with gross specific surface area; lag time exhibited a weaker, negative correlation (r2 = 0.930) with gross specific surface area. Crystallinity was shown to have a relatively minor effect on the digestion rate and lag time. Swelling of microcrystalline cellulose with 72 to 77% phosphoric acid yielded substrates which were fermented slightly more rapidly than the original material. However, treatment with higher concentrations of phosphoric acid resulted in a more slowly fermented substrate, despite a decrease in crystallinity and an increase in pore volume. This reduced fermentation rate was apparently due to the partial conversion of the cellulose from the type I to the type II allomorph, since mercerized (type II) cellulose was also fermented more slowly, and only after a much longer lag period. The results are consistent with earlier evidence for the cell-associated nature of cellulolytic enzymes of ruminal bacteria and suggest that ruminal microflora do not rapidly adapt to utilization of celluloses with altered unit cell structures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Studies on ruminant saliva. 1. the composition and output of sheep’s saliva.
McDougall, E. I. (1948) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj0430099 · Cited by 1,970
Cited by
Microbial Cellulose Utilization: Fundamentals and Biotechnology
Lynd, L. R., Weimer, P. J., van Zyl, W. H., & Pretorius, I. S. (2002) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.66.3.506-577.2002 · Cited by 4,726
Self-citationZhang, Y. P., & Lynd, L. R. (2004) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.20282 · Cited by 1,893
Substrate and Enzyme Characteristics that Limit Cellulose Hydrolysis
Mansfield, S. D., Mooney, C., & Saddler, J. N. (1999) · Biotechnology Progress · doi:10.1021/bp9900864 · Cited by 869
Zhang, Y.-H. P., Cui, J., Lynd, L. R., & Kuang, L. R. (2006) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm050799c · Cited by 548
Weimer, P. J. (2015) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00296 · Cited by 487
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Weimer, P. J., Lopez-Guisa, J. M., & French, A. D.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1990-08
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2421-2429
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1654854873
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of cellulose fine structure on kinetics of its digestion by mixed ruminal microorganisms in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.56.8.2421-2429.1990
- The paper
- Weimer, P. J., Lopez-Guisa, J. M., & French, A. D. (1990). Effect of cellulose fine structure on kinetics of its digestion by mixed ruminal microorganisms in vitro. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.56.8.2421-2429.1990
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.