The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Distribution and Rate of Methane Oxidation in Sediments of the Florida Everglades
Open accessAbstract
Rates of methane emission from intact cores were measured during anoxic dark and oxic light and dark incubations. Rates of methane oxidation were calculated on the basis of oxic incubations by using the anoxic emissions as an estimate of the maximum potential flux. This technique indicated that methane oxidation consumed up to 91% of the maximum potential flux in peat sediments but that oxidation was negligible in marl sediments. Oxygen microprofiles determined for intact cores were comparable to profiles measured in situ. Thus, the laboratory incubations appeared to provide a reasonable approximation of in situ activities. This was further supported by the agreement between measured methane fluxes and fluxes predicted on the basis of methane profiles determined by in situ sampling of pore water. Methane emissions from peat sediments, oxygen concentrations and penetration depths, and methane concentration profiles were all sensitive to light-dark shifts as determined by a combination of field and laboratory analyses. Methane emissions were lower and oxygen concentrations and penetration depths were higher under illuminated than under dark conditions; the profiles of methane concentration changed in correspondence to the changes in oxygen profiles, but the estimated flux of methane into the oxic zone changed negligibly. Sediment-free, root-associated methane oxidation showed a pattern similar to that for methane oxidation in the core analyses: no oxidation was detected for roots growing in marl sediment, even for roots of Cladium jamaicense , which had the highest activity for samples from peat sediments. The magnitude of the root-associated oxidation rates indicated that belowground plant surfaces may not markedly increase the total capacity for methane consumption. However, the data collectively support the notion that the distribution and activity of methane oxidation have a major impact on the magnitude of atmospheric fluxes from the Everglades.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Production, oxidation, emission and consumption of methane by soils: A review
Le Mer, J., & Roger, P. (2001) · European Journal of Soil Biology · doi:10.1016/s1164-5563(01)01067-6 · Cited by 2,123
Soil microorganisms as controllers of atmospheric trace gases (H2, CO, CH4, OCS, N2O, and NO)
Conrad, R. (1996) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.60.4.609-640.1996 · Cited by 1,751
Methane production and methane consumption: a review of processes underlying wetland methane fluxes
Segers, R. (1998) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1023/a:1005929032764 · Cited by 907
Biogeochemistry of Methane Exchange between Natural Wetlands and the Atmosphere
Whalen, S. C. (2005) · Environmental Engineering Science · doi:10.1089/ees.2005.22.73 · Cited by 709
Capacity for methane oxidation in landfill cover soils measured in laboratory-scale soil microcosms
Kightley, D., Nedwell, D. B., & Cooper, M. (1995) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.61.2.592-601.1995 · Cited by 335
Metadata
- Authors
- King, G. M., Roslev, P., & Skovgaard, H.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1990-09
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2902-2911
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1769420201
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distribution and Rate of Methane Oxidation in Sediments of the Florida Everglades. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.56.9.2902-2911.1990
- The paper
- King, G. M., Roslev, P., & Skovgaard, H. (1990). Distribution and Rate of Methane Oxidation in Sediments of the Florida Everglades. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.56.9.2902-2911.1990
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.