Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 368

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pathways and Microbiology of Thiosulfate Transformations and Sulfate Reduction in a Marine Sediment (Kattegat, Denmark)

Open access
Jørgensen, Bo Barker, Bak, Friedhelm·1991·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Reductive and oxidative pathways of the sulfur cycle were studied in a marine sediment by parallel radiotracer experiments with 35 SO 4 2- , H 2 35 S, and 35 S 2 O 3 2- injected into undisturbed sediment cores. The distributions of viable populations of sulfate- and thiosulfate-reducing bacteria and of thiosulfate-disproportionating bacteria were concurrently determined. Sulfate reduction occurred both in the reducing sediment layers and in oxidized and even oxic surface layers. The population density of sulfate-reducing bacteria was >10 6 cm -3 in the oxic layer, high enough that it could possibly account for the measured rates of sulfate reduction. The bacterial numbers counted in the reducing sediment layers were 100-fold lower. The dominant sulfate reducers growing on acetate or H 2 were gas-vacuolated motile rods which were previously undescribed. The products of sulfide oxidation, which took place in both oxidized and reduced sediment layers, were 65 to 85% S 2 O 3 2- and 35 to 15% SO 4 2- . Thiosulfate was concurrently oxidized to sulfate, reduced to sulfide, and disproportionated to sulfate and sulfide. There was a gradual shift from predominance of oxidation toward predominance of reduction with depth in the sediment. Disproportionation was the most important pathway overall. Thiosulfate disproportionation occurred only as cometabolism in the marine acetate-utilizing sulfate-reducing bacteria, which could not conserve energy for growth from this process alone. Oxidative and reductive cycling of sulfur thus occurred in all sediment layers with an intermediate “thiosulfate shunt” as an important mechanism regulating the electron flow.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.57.3.847-856.1991

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Cited by

See all 368

Metadata

Authors
Jørgensen, B. B., & Bak, F.
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
1991-03
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
847-856
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W1606242578
Cited by
368
References
40
FWCI
19.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pathways and Microbiology of Thiosulfate Transformations and Sulfate Reduction in a Marine Sediment (Kattegat, Denmark). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.57.3.847-856.1991
The paper
Jørgensen, B. B., & Bak, F. (1991). Pathways and Microbiology of Thiosulfate Transformations and Sulfate Reduction in a Marine Sediment (Kattegat, Denmark). Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.57.3.847-856.1991

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.