Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 721

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A comparison of methods for the quantification of bacterial sulfate reduction in coastal marine sediments: I. Measurement with radiotracer techniques

J⊘rgensen, Bo Barker·1978·Geomicrobiology Journal

Abstract

A radiotracer technique for measuring in situ rates of sulfate reduction in marine sediments is described. Microliter portions of labeled‐sulfate solution are injected into undisturbed sediment cores, and the amount of labeled sulfide produced is analyzed. This tracer method is experimentally compared with a method that mixes label into the sediment. Controls and methodological problems of both methods are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01490457809377721

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 721

Metadata

Authors
J⊘rgensen, B. B.
Venue
Geomicrobiology Journal
Published
1978-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
11-27
ISSN
  • 0149-0451 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0529
OpenAlex
W1586239332
Cited by
721
References
15
FWCI
9.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of methods for the quantification of bacterial sulfate reduction in coastal marine sediments: I. Measurement with radiotracer techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01490457809377721
The paper
J⊘rgensen, B. B. (1978). A comparison of methods for the quantification of bacterial sulfate reduction in coastal marine sediments: I. Measurement with radiotracer techniques. Geomicrobiology Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490457809377721

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.