The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A major Pseudomonas aeruginosa clone common to patients and aquatic habitats
Open accessAbstract
The genomic relatedness of 573 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains from environmental and clinical habitats was examined by digesting the genome with the rare-cutting enzyme SpeI. Thirty-nine strains were collected from environmental habitats mainly of aquatic origin, like rivers, lakes, or sanitary facilities. Four hundred fifty strains were collected from 76 patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) treated at four different centers, and 25 additional clinical isolates were collected from patients suffering from other diseases. Twenty-nine P. aeruginosa isolates were collected from the environment of one CF clinic. Thirty strains from culture collections were of environmental and clinic origin. A common macrorestriction fingerprint pattern was found in 13 of 46 CF patients, 5 of 29 environmental isolates from the same hospital, in a single ear infection isolate from another hospital, and 8 of 38 isolates from aquatic habitats about 300 km away from the CF clinic. The data indicate that closely related variants of one major clone (called clone C) persisted in various spatially and temporally separated habitats. Southern analysis of the clonal variants with six gene probes and two probes for genes coding for rRNA revealed almost the same hybridization patterns. With the exception of the phenotypically rapidly evolving CF isolates, the close relatedness of the strains of the clone was also shown by their identical responses in pyocin typing, phage typing, and serotyping. Besides clone C, three other P. aeruginosa clones were isolated from more than one clinical or environmental source.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Genetic adaptation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the airways of cystic fibrosis patients
Smith, E. E., Buckley, D. G., Wu, Z., Saenphimmachak, C., Hoffman, L. R., D’Argenio, D. A., Miller, S. I., Ramsey, B. W., Speert, D. P., Moskowitz, S. M., et al. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0602138103 · Cited by 1,319
Pseudomonas genomes: diverse and adaptable
Silby, M. W., Winstanley, C., Godfrey, S. A. C., Levy, S. B., & Jackson, R. W. (2011) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00269.x · Cited by 960
Kummerer, K. (2004) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkh325 · Cited by 935
Clinical Significance of Microbial Infection and Adaptation in Cystic Fibrosis
Hauser, A. R., Jain, M., Bar-Meir, M., & McColley, S. A. (2011) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00036-10 · Cited by 411
Microcolony formation: a novel biofilm model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa for the cystic fibrosis lung
Sriramulu, D. D., Lünsdorf, H., Lam, J. S., & Römling, U. (2005) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/jmm.0.45969-0 · Cited by 366
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Römling, U., Wingender, J., Müller, H., & Tümmler, B.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1994-06
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1734-1738
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1941033876
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A major Pseudomonas aeruginosa clone common to patients and aquatic habitats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.60.6.1734-1738.1994
- The paper
- Römling, U., Wingender, J., Müller, H., & Tümmler, B. (1994). A major Pseudomonas aeruginosa clone common to patients and aquatic habitats. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.60.6.1734-1738.1994
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.