The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Development of a robust flow cytometric assay for determining numbers of viable bacteria
Open accessAbstract
Several fluorescent probes were evaluated as indicators of bacterial viability by flow cytometry. The probes monitor a number of biological factors that are altered during loss of viability. The factors include alterations in membrane permeability, monitored by using fluorogenic substrates and fluorescent intercalating dyes such as propidium iodide, and changes in membrane potential, monitored by using fluorescent cationic and anionic potential-sensitive probes. Of the fluorescent reagents examined, the fluorescent anionic membrane potential probe bis-(1,3-dibutylbarbituric acid)trimethine oxonol [DiBAC(inf4)(3)] proved the best candidate for use as a general robust viability marker and is a promising choice for use in high-throughput assays. With this probe, live and dead cells within a population can be identified and counted 10 min after sampling. There was a close correlation between viable counts determined by flow cytometry and by standard CFU assays for samples of untreated cells. The results indicate that flow cytometry is a sensitive analytical technique that can rapidly monitor physiological changes of individual microorganisms as a result of external perturbations. The membrane potential probe DiBAC(inf4)(3) provided a robust flow cytometric indicator for bacterial cell viability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bacterial viability and antibiotic susceptibility testing with SYTOX green nucleic acid stain
Roth, B. L., Poot, M., Yue, S. T., & Millard, P. J. (1997) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.63.6.2421-2431.1997 · Cited by 579
Bowman, J. C., Hicks, P. S., Kurtz, M. B., Rosen, H., Schmatz, D. M., Liberator, P. A., & Douglas, C. M. (2002) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.46.9.3001-3012.2002 · Cited by 303
Applications of flow cytometry to clinical microbiology
Álvarez-Barrientos, A., Arroyo, J., Cantón, R., Nombela, C., & Sánchez-Pérez, M. (2000) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.13.2.167 · Cited by 300
Trends in rhizobial inoculant production and use
Catroux, G., Hartmann, A., & Revellin, C. (2001) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1004777115628 · Cited by 278
Fluorescence staining and flow cytometry for monitoring microbial cells
Veal, D. A., Deere, D., Ferrari, B., Piper, J., & Attfield, P. V. (2000) · Journal of Immunological Methods · doi:10.1016/s0022-1759(00)00234-9 · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- Jepras, R. I., Carter, J., Pearson, S. C., Paul, F. E., & Wilkinson, M. J.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2696-2701
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2147190270
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of a robust flow cytometric assay for determining numbers of viable bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.61.7.2696-2701.1995
- The paper
- Jepras, R. I., Carter, J., Pearson, S. C., Paul, F. E., & Wilkinson, M. J. (1995). Development of a robust flow cytometric assay for determining numbers of viable bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.61.7.2696-2701.1995
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.