The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Efficacy of ozonated water against various food-related microorganisms
Open accessAbstract
The antimicrobial effects of ozonated water in a recirculating concurrent reactor were evaluated against four gram-positive and four gram-negative bacteria, two yeasts, and spores of Aspergillus niger. More than 5 log units each of Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli cells were killed instantaneously in ozonated water with or without addition of 20 ppm of soluble starch (SS). In ozonated water, death rates among the gram-negative bacteria--S. typhimurium, E. coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Yersinia enterocolitica--were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Among gram-positive bacteria, Listeria monocytogenes was significantly P < 0.05) more sensitive than either Staphylococcus aureus or Enterococcus faecalis. In the presence of organic material, death rates of S. aureus compared with L. monocytogenes and E. coli compared with S. typhimurium in ozonated water were not significantly (P > 0.05) affected by SS addition but were significantly reduced (P < 0.05) by addition of 20 ppm of bovine serum albumin (BSA). More than 4.5 log units each of Candida albicans and Zygosaccharomyces bailii cells were killed instantaneously in ozonated water, whereas less than 1 log unit of Aspergillus niger spores was killed after a 5-min exposure. The average ozone output levels in the deionized water (0.188 mg/ml) or water with SS (0.198 mg/ml) did not differ significantly (P < 0.05) but were significantly lower in water containing BSA (0.149 mg/ml).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microbiological Aspects of Ozone Applications in Food: A Review
Khadre, M. A., Yousef, A. E., & Kim, J. ‐. (2001) · Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2001.tb15196.x · Cited by 837
Use of ozone in the food industry
Guzel-Seydim, Z. B., Greene, A. K., & Seydim, A. C. (2004) · LWT - Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2003.10.014 · Cited by 688
Sustainable sanitation techniques for keeping quality and safety of fresh-cut plant commodities
Artés, F., Gómez, P., Aguayo, E., Escalona, V., & Artés-Hernández, F. (2009) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.10.003 · Cited by 393
Ozone Based Food Preservation: A Promising Green Technology for Enhanced Food Safety
Pandiselvam, R., Subhashini, S., Banuu Priya, E. P., Kothakota, A., Ramesh, S. V., & Shahir, S. (2019) · Ozone: Science & Engineering · doi:10.1080/01919512.2018.1490636 · Cited by 291
Control of Salmonella in food related environments by chemical disinfection
Møretrø, T., Heir, E., Nesse, L. L., Vestby, L. K., & Langsrud, S. (2012) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2011.02.002 · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Authors
- Restaino, L., Frampton, E. W., Hemphill, J. B., & Palnikar, P.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1995-09
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3471-3475
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2105346320
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy of ozonated water against various food-related microorganisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.61.9.3471-3475.1995
- The paper
- Restaino, L., Frampton, E. W., Hemphill, J. B., & Palnikar, P. (1995). Efficacy of ozonated water against various food-related microorganisms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.61.9.3471-3475.1995
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.