The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Community analysis of the bacterial assemblages in the winter cover and pelagic layers of a high mountain lake by in situ hybridization
Open accessAbstract
The bacterial community structure in the winter cover and pelagic zone of a high mountain lake was analyzed by in situ hybridization with fluorescently labeled rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes. Cells fixed on membrane filters were hybridized with a probe specific for the domain Bacteria as well as with probes for the alpha, beta, and gamma subclasses of the class Proteobacteria and the Cytophaga-Flavobacterium group. The fraction of bacteria detectable after hybridization with the bacterial probe EUB ranged from 40 to 81% of 4(prm1),6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) counts. The bacterial assemblage varied considerably between and within different habitats (snow, slush, and lake water) but was in most cases dominated by members of the beta subclass (6.5 to 116% of bacteria detectable with probe EUB). The sum of bacteria hybridizing with group-specific probes was usually lower than the fraction detectable with probe EUB. Image analysis was used to characterize morphology and the size-specific biomass distribution of bacterial assemblages, which clearly separated the three habitats. Although the measured secondary production parameters and the fraction of 2-(p-iodophenyl)-3-(p-nitrophenyl)-5-phenyltetrazolium chloride-reducing bacteria varied by more than an order of magnitude in the different slush and pelagic layers, detectability with the fluorescent probe EUB was constantly high. Physiological strategies of bacteria under nutrient limitation and at low temperatures are discussed in the context of the ribosome content of single cells. This study confirms the suitability of fluorescently labeled rRNA-targeted probes for the characterization of bacterial population structures even in oligotrophic habitats.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for direct visualization of microorganisms
Moter, A., & Göbel, U. B. (2000) · Journal of Microbiological Methods · doi:10.1016/s0167-7012(00)00152-4 · Cited by 787
daime , a novel image analysis program for microbial ecology and biofilm research
Daims, H., Lücker, S., & Wagner, M. (2006) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00880.x · Cited by 579
Diversity and ecology of psychrophilic microorganisms
Margesin, R., & Miteva, V. (2011) · Research in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2010.12.004 · Cited by 518
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes
Pernthaler, J., Glöckner, F.-O., Schönhuber, W., & Amann, R. (2001) · Methods in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0580-9517(01)30046-6 · Cited by 489
Self-citationCottrell, M. T., & Kirchman, D. L. (2000) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.66.12.5116-5122.2000 · Cited by 455
Metadata
- Authors
- Alfreider, A., Pernthaler, J., Amann, R., Sattler, B., Glockner, F., Wille, A., & Psenner, R.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2138-2144
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2120771692
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Community analysis of the bacterial assemblages in the winter cover and pelagic layers of a high mountain lake by in situ hybridization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.62.6.2138-2144.1996
- The paper
- Alfreider, A., Pernthaler, J., Amann, R., Sattler, B., Glockner, F., Wille, A., & Psenner, R. (1996). Community analysis of the bacterial assemblages in the winter cover and pelagic layers of a high mountain lake by in situ hybridization. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.62.6.2138-2144.1996
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.