The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Community Composition of Marine Bacterioplankton Determined by 16S rRNA Gene Clone Libraries and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
Open accessAbstract
We determined the compositions of bacterioplankton communities in surface waters of coastal California using clone libraries of 16S rRNA genes and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in order to compare the community structures inferred from these two culture-independent approaches. The compositions of two clone libraries were quite similar to those of clone libraries of marine bacterioplankton examined by previous studies. Clones from γ-proteobacteria comprised ca. 28% of the libraries, while approximately 55% of the clones came from α-proteobacteria, which dominated the clone libraries. The Cytophaga-Flavobacter group and three others each comprised 10% or fewer of the clone libraries. The community composition determined by FISH differed substantially from the composition implied by the clone libraries. The Cytophaga-Flavobacter group dominated 8 of the 11 communities assayed by FISH, including the two communities assayed using clone libraries. On average only 10% of DAPI (4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole)-stained bacteria were detected by FISH with a probe for α-proteobacteria, but 30% of DAPI-stained bacteria appeared to be in the Cytophaga-Flavobacter group as determined by FISH. α-Proteobacteria were greatly overrepresented in clone libraries compared to their relative abundance determined by FISH, while the Cytophaga-Flavobacter group was underrepresented in clone libraries. Our data show that the Cytophaga-Flavobacter group can be a numerically dominant component of coastal marine bacterioplankton communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics
Stackebrandt, E. S., & Goodfellow, M. (1991) · Wiley eBooks · Cited by 9,460
Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation
Amann, R., Ludwig, W., & SCHLEIFER, K. H. (1995) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.59.1.143-169.1995 · Cited by 9,093
Lane, D. (1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,190
The use of DAPI for identifying and counting aquatic microflora1
Porter, K. G., & Feig, Y. S. (1980) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1980.25.5.0943 · Cited by 5,047
Amann, R. I., Binder, B. J., Olson, R. J., Chisholm, S. W., Devereux, R., & Stahl, D. A. (1990) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.56.6.1919-1925.1990 · Cited by 4,021
Determination of microbial diversity in environmental samples: pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis
v. Wintzingerode, F. (1997) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0168-6445(97)00057-0 · Cited by 2,063
Manz, W., Amann, R., Ludwig, W., Wagner, M., & Schleifer, K.-H. (1992) · Systematic and Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0723-2020(11)80121-9 · Cited by 2,043
Bias caused by template annealing in the amplification of mixtures of 16S rRNA genes by PCR
Suzuki, M. T., & Giovannoni, S. J. (1996) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.62.2.625-630.1996 · Cited by 1,881
Handbook of Methods in Aquatic Microbial Ecology
(2018) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780203752746 · Cited by 1,446
Cited by
SAR11 clade dominates ocean surface bacterioplankton communities
Morris, R. M., Rappé, M. S., Connon, S. A., Vergin, K. L., Siebold, W. A., Carlson, C. A., & Giovannoni, S. J. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01240 · Cited by 1,129
Microbial communities in acid mine drainage
Baker, B. J., & Banfield, J. F. (2003) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1016/s0168-6496(03)00028-x · Cited by 1,119
Predation on prokaryotes in the water column and its ecological implications
Pernthaler, J. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1180 · Cited by 803
Acinas, S. G., Sarma-Rupavtarm, R., Klepac-Ceraj, V., & Polz, M. F. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.12.8966-8969.2005 · Cited by 625
Prevalent genome streamlining and latitudinal divergence of planktonic bacteria in the surface ocean
Swan, B. K., Tupper, B., Sczyrba, A., Lauro, F. M., Martinez-Garcia, M., González, J. M., Luo, H., Wright, J. J., Landry, Z. C., Hanson, N. W., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1304246110 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Cottrell, M. T., & Kirchman, D. L.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5116-5122
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2142894759
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 22.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Community Composition of Marine Bacterioplankton Determined by 16S rRNA Gene Clone Libraries and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.66.12.5116-5122.2000
- The paper
- Cottrell, M. T., & Kirchman, D. L. (2000). Community Composition of Marine Bacterioplankton Determined by 16S rRNA Gene Clone Libraries and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.66.12.5116-5122.2000
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.