The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The composition of fluorescent pseudomonad populations associated with roots is influenced by plant and soil type
Open accessAbstract
Populations of fluorescent pseudomonads isolated from an uncultivated soil and from the roots of two plant species were previously shown to differ (P. Lemanceau, T. Corberand, L. Gardan, X. Latour, G. Laguerre, J.-M. Boeufgras, and C. Alabouvette, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:1004-1012, 1995). The diversities of fluorescent pseudomonads, from two uncultivated soils and from the roots of two plant species cultivated in these two soils, were compared. The phenotypic diversity of the bacterial isolates was characterized on the basis of biochemical and physiological tests and on the basis of their ability to utilize 147 different organic compounds. The genotypic diversity of the isolates was characterized on the basis of the types of 16S genes coding for rRNA (rDNA), their repetitive extragenic palindromic patterns by PCR, and plasmid profiles. Taxonomic identification of the isolates was achieved with both biochemical and physiological tests and by comparing their 16S rDNA types to those of reference and type strains of fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. Numerical analysis of phenotypic characteristics allowed the clustering of isolates that showed high levels of similarity. This analysis indicated that both soil type and host plant had an effect on the diversity of fluorescent pseudomonads. However, of the two factors studied, the soil was clearly the dominating one. Indeed, the populations associated with the roots of each plant species varied from one soil to the other. This variation could possibly be ascribed to the differences recorded between the phenotypically diverse populations of fluorescent pseudomonads from the two uncultivated soils. The plant selection was, at least partly, plant specific. It was not related to bacterial species and biovars or to the presence of plasmid DNA. The phenotypic clustering of isolates was well correlated with genotypic characterization by repetitive extragenic palindrome-PCR fingerprinting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Berg, G., & Smalla, K. (2009) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00654.x · Cited by 2,264
Garbeva, P., van Veen, J. A., & van Elsas, J. D. (2004) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.012604.135455 · Cited by 1,458
Doornbos, R. F., van Loon, L. C., & Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2012) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-011-0028-y · Cited by 706
Plant root-microbe communication in shaping root microbiomes
Lareen, A., Burton, F., & Schäfer, P. (2016) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-015-0417-8 · Cited by 668
Duffy, B. K., & Défago, G. (1999) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.65.6.2429-2438.1999 · Cited by 486
Metadata
- Authors
- Latour, X., Corberand, T., Laguerre, G., Allard, F., & Lemanceau, P.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2449-2456
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2102000260
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The composition of fluorescent pseudomonad populations associated with roots is influenced by plant and soil type. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.62.7.2449-2456.1996
- The paper
- Latour, X., Corberand, T., Laguerre, G., Allard, F., & Lemanceau, P. (1996). The composition of fluorescent pseudomonad populations associated with roots is influenced by plant and soil type. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.62.7.2449-2456.1996
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.