The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phylogenetic analysis and in situ identification of bacteria in activated sludge
Open accessAbstract
The bacterial community structure of activated sludge of a large municipal wastewater treatment plant was investigated by use of the rRNA approach. Almost-full-length genes coding for the small-subunit rRNA (rDNA) were amplified by PCR and subsequently cloned into the pGEM-T vector. Clones were screened by dot blot hybridization with group-specific oligonucleotide probes. The phylogenetic affiliations of clones were compared with the results obtained with the original sample by in situ hybridization with fluorescently labeled, rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes and found to be in general agreement. Twenty-five 16S rDNA clones were fully sequenced, 11 were almost fully (> 80%) sequenced, and 27 were partially sequenced. By comparative sequence analyses, the majority of the examined clones (35 of 67) could be affiliated with the beta subclass of the class Proteobacteria. The gamma and alpha subclasses of Proteobacteria were represented by 13 and 4 clones, respectively. Eight clones grouped with the epsilon group of Proteobacteria, and five clones grouped with gram-positive bacteria with a low DNA G+C content. The 16S rDNA of two clones showed similarity with 16S rDNA genes of members of the phyla Chlamydiae and Planctomyces. 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes were designed and used for the enumeration of the respective bacteria. Interestingly, potentially pathogenic representatives of the genus Arcobacter were present in significant numbers (4%) in the activated sludge sample examined. Pairs of probes targeted to the 5' and 3' regions were used for detection of chimeric sequences by in situ hybridization. Two clones could be identified as chimera by applying such a pair of probes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Swidsinski, A., Weber, J., Loening-Baucke, V., Hale, L. P., & Lochs, H. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.43.7.3380-3389.2005 · Cited by 894
Methanotrophy below pH 1 by a new Verrucomicrobia species
Pol, A., Heijmans, K., Harhangi, H. R., Tedesco, D., Jetten, M. S. M., & Op den Camp, H. J. M. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06222 · Cited by 432
Swidsinski, A. (2005) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v11.i8.1131 · Cited by 314
Eckert, B., Weber, O. B., Kirchhof, G., Halbritter, A., Stoffels, M., & Hartmann, A. (2001) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00207713-51-1-17 · Cited by 248
Metadata
- Authors
- Snaidr, J., Amann, R., Huber, I., Ludwig, W., & Schleifer, K. H.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1997-07
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2884-2896
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2104200271
- Cited by
- 711
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 40.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogenetic analysis and in situ identification of bacteria in activated sludge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.63.7.2884-2896.1997
- The paper
- Snaidr, J., Amann, R., Huber, I., Ludwig, W., & Schleifer, K. H. (1997). Phylogenetic analysis and in situ identification of bacteria in activated sludge. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.63.7.2884-2896.1997
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.