The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diverse uncultivated bacterial groups from soils of the arid southwestern United States that are present in many geographic regions
Open accessAbstract
We have performed a phylogenetic survey of microbial species present in two soils from northern Arizona. Microbial DNA was purified directly from soil samples and subjected to PCR amplification with primers specific for bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences (rDNAs). Clone libraries from the two soils were constructed, and 60 clone inserts were partially sequenced. Phylogenetic analysis of these sequences revealed extensive diversity. Most of the analyzed sequences (64%) fell into five novel clusters having no known cultured members. Extensive analysis of 10 nearly full-length rDNAs from clones representative of the novel groups indicated that four of the five groups probably cluster into a large "supergroup" which is as distinct from currently recognized bacterial divisions as the latter are from each other. From this we postulate the existence of a major bacterial lineage, previously known only from a single cultured representative, whose diversity and ecology we are only beginning to explore. Analysis of our data and that from other rDNA sequence-based studies of soils from different geographic regions shows considerable overlap of sequence types. Taken together, these groups encompass most of the novel rDNA sequences recovered in each comparable analysis reported to date, despite large differences in soil types and geographic sources. Our results indicate that members of these new groups comprise a phylogenetically diverse, geographically widespread, and perhaps numerically important component of the soil microbiota.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Jones, R. T., Robeson, M. S., Lauber, C. L., Hamady, M., Knight, R., & Fierer, N. (2009) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2008.127 · Cited by 1,230
The ecology of Acidobacteria: moving beyond genes and genomes
Kielak, A. M., Barreto, C. C., Kowalchuk, G. A., van Veen, J. A., & Kuramae, E. E. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00744 · Cited by 1,033
Dunbar, J., Ticknor, L. O., & Kuske, C. R. (2001) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.67.1.190-197.2001 · Cited by 561
Self-citationAraújo, W. L., Marcon, J., Maccheroni, W., van Elsas, J. D., van Vuurde, J. W. L., & Azevedo, J. L. (2002) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.68.10.4906-4914.2002 · Cited by 555
Laboratory Cultivation of Widespread and PreviouslyUncultured SoilBacteria
Joseph, S. J., Hugenholtz, P., Sangwan, P., Osborne, C. A., & Janssen, P. H. (2003) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.69.12.7210-7215.2003 · Cited by 499
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuske, C. R., Barns, S. M., & Busch, J. D.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1997-09
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3614-3621
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1569041852
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diverse uncultivated bacterial groups from soils of the arid southwestern United States that are present in many geographic regions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.63.9.3614-3621.1997
- The paper
- Kuske, C. R., Barns, S. M., & Busch, J. D. (1997). Diverse uncultivated bacterial groups from soils of the arid southwestern United States that are present in many geographic regions. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.63.9.3614-3621.1997
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.