The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantification of 16S rRNAs in Complex Bacterial Communities by Multiple Competitive Reverse Transcription-PCR in Temperature Gradient Gel Electrophoresis Fingerprints
Open accessAbstract
A novel approach was developed to quantify rRNA sequences in complex bacterial communities. The main bacterial 16S rRNAs in Drentse A grassland soils (The Netherlands) were amplified by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR with bacterium-specific primers and were separated by temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE). The primer pair used (primers U968-GC and L1401) was found to amplify with the same efficiency 16S rRNAs from bacterial cultures containing different taxa and cloned 16S ribosomal DNA amplicons from uncultured soil bacteria. The sequence-specific efficiency of amplification was determined by monitoring the amplification kinetics by kinetic PCR. The primer-specific amplification efficiency was assessed by competitive PCR and RT-PCR, and identical input amounts of different 16S rRNAs resulted in identical amplicon yields. The sequence-specific detection system used for competitive amplifications was TGGE, which also has been found to be suitable for simultaneous quantification of more than one sequence. We demonstrate that this approach can be applied to TGGE fingerprints of soil bacteria to estimate the ratios of the bacterial 16S rRNAs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efficiency of DNA replication in the polymerase chain reaction
Stolovitzky, G., & Cecchi, G. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.23.12947 · Cited by 112
Cited by
Who is eating what: diet assessment using next generation sequencing
POMPANON, F., DEAGLE, B. E., SYMONDSON, W. O. C., BROWN, D. S., JARMAN, S. N., & TABERLET, P. (2012) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2011.05403.x · Cited by 1,293
Osborn, A. M., Moore, E. R. B., & Timmis, K. N. (2000) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1462-2920.2000.00081.x · Cited by 847
Nitrification in acid soils: micro-organisms and mechanisms
De Boer, W., & Kowalchuk, G. A. (2001) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0038-0717(00)00247-9 · Cited by 785
Gastrointestinal Microflora Studies in Late‐Onset Autism
Finegold, S. M., Molitoris, D., Song, Y., Liu, C., Vaisanen, M., Bolte, E., McTeague, M., Sandler, R., Wexler, H., Marlowe, E. M., et al. (2002) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/341914 · Cited by 742
Microbial Population Changes during Bioremediation of an Experimental Oil Spill
MacNaughton, S. J., Stephen, J. R., Venosa, A. D., Davis, G. A., Chang, Y.-J., & White, D. C. (1999) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.65.8.3566-3574.1999 · Cited by 607
Metadata
- Authors
- Felske, A., Akkermans, A. D. L., & De Vos, W. M.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4581-4587
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2146996002
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantification of 16S rRNAs in Complex Bacterial Communities by Multiple Competitive Reverse Transcription-PCR in Temperature Gradient Gel Electrophoresis Fingerprints. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.64.11.4581-4587.1998
- The paper
- Felske, A., Akkermans, A. D. L., & De Vos, W. M. (1998). Quantification of 16S rRNAs in Complex Bacterial Communities by Multiple Competitive Reverse Transcription-PCR in Temperature Gradient Gel Electrophoresis Fingerprints. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.64.11.4581-4587.1998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.