The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phylogeny of the Main Bacterial 16S rRNA Sequences in Drentse A Grassland Soils (The Netherlands)
Open accessAbstract
The main bacteria in peaty, acid grassland soils in the Netherlands were investigated by ribosome isolation, temperature gradient gel electrophoresis, hybridization, cloning, and sequencing. Instead of using only 16S rDNA to determine the sequences present, we focused on rRNA to classify and quantify the most active bacteria. After direct ribosome isolation from soil, a partial amplicon of bacterial 16S rRNA was generated by reverse transcription-PCR. The sequence-specific separation by temperature gradient gel electrophoresis yielded soil-specific fingerprints, which were compared to signals from a clone library of genes coding for 16S rRNA. Cloned 16S rDNA sequences matching with intense bands in the fingerprint were sequenced. The relationships of the sequences to those of cultured organisms of known phylogeny were determined. Most of the amplicons originated from organisms closely related to Bacillus species. Such sequences were also detected by direct dot blot hybridization on soil rRNA: a probe specific for Firmicutes with low G+C content counted for about 50% of all bacterial rRNA. The bacterial activity in Drentse A grassland soil could be estimated by direct dot blot hybridization and sequencing of clones; it was found that about 65% of all the bacterial ribosomes originated from Firmicutes . The most active bacteria apparently were Bacillus species, from which about half of the sequences derived. Other sequences similar to those of gram-positive bacteria were only remotely related to known Firmicutes with a high G+C content. Other sequences were related to Proteobacteria , mainly the alpha subclass.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phylogenetic analysis of dissimilatory Fe(III)-reducing bacteria
Lonergan, D. J., Jenter, H. L., Coates, J. D., Phillips, E. J., Schmidt, T. M., & Lovley, D. R. (1996) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.178.8.2402-2408.1996 · Cited by 380 · cited 1×
“Apart from these several dozen environmental sequences, only three cultured strains were described in this cluster: Acidobacterium capsulatum (22), Holophaga foetida (26), and “Geothrix fermentans” (27).”
Background
Cited by
Jones, R. T., Robeson, M. S., Lauber, C. L., Hamady, M., Knight, R., & Fierer, N. (2009) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2008.127 · Cited by 1,230
Sessitsch, A., Weilharter, A., Gerzabek, M. H., Kirchmann, H., & Kandeler, E. (2001) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.67.9.4215-4224.2001 · Cited by 722
Marilley, L., & Aragno, M. (1999) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/s0929-1393(99)00028-1 · Cited by 317
McCaig, A. E., Glover, L. A., & Prosser, J. I. (2001) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.67.10.4554-4559.2001 · Cited by 286
Do Composts Affect the Soil Microbial Community?
Knapp, B. A., Ros, M., & Insam, H. (2010) · Microbes at Work · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04043-6_14 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Felske, A., Wolterink, A., Van Lis, R., & Akkermans, A. D. L.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 871-879
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2119517235
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 33.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogeny of the Main Bacterial 16S rRNA Sequences in Drentse A Grassland Soils (The Netherlands). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.64.3.871-879.1998
- The paper
- Felske, A., Wolterink, A., Van Lis, R., & Akkermans, A. D. L. (1998). Phylogeny of the Main Bacterial 16S rRNA Sequences in Drentse A Grassland Soils (The Netherlands). Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.64.3.871-879.1998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.