The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis of Escherichia coli O157:H7 Survival in Ovine or Bovine Manure and Manure Slurry
Open accessAbstract
Farm animal manure or manure slurry may disseminate, transmit, or propagate Escherichia coli O157:H7. In this study, the survival and growth of E. coli O157:H7 in ovine or bovine feces under various experimental and environmental conditions were determined. A manure pile collected from experimentally inoculated sheep was incubated outside under fluctuating environmental conditions.E. coli O157:H7 survived in the manure for 21 months, and the concentrations of bacteria recovered ranged from <10 2 to 10 6 CFU/g at different times over the course of the experiment. The DNA fingerprints of E. coli O157:H7 isolated at month 1 and month 12 were identical or very similar. A second E. coli O157:H7-positive ovine manure pile, which was periodically aerated by mixing, remained culture positive for 4 months. An E. coli O157:H7-positive bovine manure pile was culture positive for 47 days. In the laboratory,E. coli O157:H7 was inoculated into feces, untreated slurry, or treated slurry and incubated at −20, 4, 23, 37, 45, and 70°C.E. coli O157:H7 survived best in manure incubated without aeration at temperatures below 23°C, but it usually survived for shorter periods of time than it survived in manure held in the environment. The bacterium survived at least 100 days in bovine manure frozen at −20°C or in ovine manure incubated at 4 or 10°C for 100 days, but under all other conditions the length of time that it survived ranged from 24 h to 40 days. In addition, we found that the Shiga toxin type 1 and 2 genes in E. coli O157:H7 had little or no influence on bacterial survival in manure or manure slurry. The long-term survival of E. coli O157:H7 in manure emphasizes the need for appropriate farm waste management to curtail environmental spread of this bacterium. This study also highlights the difficulties in extrapolating laboratory data to on-farm conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli: emerging issues on virulence and modes of transmission
Caprioli, A., Morabito, S., Brug�re, H., & Oswald, E. (2005) · Veterinary Research · doi:10.1051/vetres:2005002 · Cited by 668
Alegbeleye, O. O., Singleton, I., & Sant’Ana, A. S. (2018) · Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.fm.2018.01.003 · Cited by 616
Fitness of Human Enteric Pathogens on Plants and Implications for Food Safety
Brandl, M. T. (2006) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143359 · Cited by 587
Ongeng, D., Geeraerd, A. H., Springael, D., Ryckeboer, J., Muyanja, C., & Mauriello, G. (2015) · Critical Reviews in Microbiology · doi:10.3109/1040841x.2013.829415 · Cited by 73
Leifert, C., Ball, K., Volakakis, N., & Cooper, J. M. (2008) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03794.x · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Kudva, I. T., Blanch, K., & Hovde, C. J.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3166-3174
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1504659673
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of Escherichia coli O157:H7 Survival in Ovine or Bovine Manure and Manure Slurry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.64.9.3166-3174.1998
- The paper
- Kudva, I. T., Blanch, K., & Hovde, C. J. (1998). Analysis of Escherichia coli O157:H7 Survival in Ovine or Bovine Manure and Manure Slurry. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.64.9.3166-3174.1998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.