The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacterial Filament Formation, a Defense Mechanism against Flagellate Grazing, Is Growth Rate Controlled in Bacteria of Different Phyla
Open accessAbstract
A facultatively filamentous bacterium was isolated from eutrophic lake water and was identified as Flectobacillus sp. strain MWH38 (a member of the Cytophaga-Flavobacterium-Bacteroides phylum) by comparative 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. Filament formation by Flectobacillus sp. strain MWH38 and filament formation by Flectobacillus major, the closest known relative of strain MWH38, were studied in chemostat cultures under grazing pressure by the bacterivorous flagellate Ochromonas sp. strain DS and without predation at several growth rates. The results clearly demonstrated that filament formation by the two flectobacilli is growth rate controlled and thus independent of the presence of a predator. However, flagellate grazing positively influenced bacterial growth rates by decreasing bacterial biomass and thus indirectly stimulated filament formation. The results of investigations of cell elongation and filament formation by Comamonas acidovorans PX54 (a member of the β subclass of the class Proteobacteria) supported the recent proposal that in this species the mechanism of filament formation is growth rate controlled. The finding that the grazing defense mechanism consisting of filament formation is growth rate controlled in the flectobacilli investigated and C. acidovorans PX54 (i.e., in bacteria belonging to divergent evolutionary phyla) may indicate that this mechanism is a phylogenetically widely distributed defense strategy against grazing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolution of Protein Molecules
JUKES, T. H., & CANTOR, C. R. (1969) · Mammalian Protein Metabolism · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3211-9.50009-7 · Cited by 11,032
Cited by
Šimek, K., Pernthaler, J., Weinbauer, M. G., Hornák, K., Dolan, J. R., Nedoma, J., Mašı́n, M., & Amann, R. (2001) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.67.6.2723-2733.2001 · Cited by 363
Hahn, M. W., Lünsdorf, H., Wu, Q., Schauer, M., Höfle, M. G., Boenigk, J., & Stadler, P. (2003) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.69.3.1442-1451.2003 · Cited by 284
Self-citation(2000) · PubMed · doi:10.1007/s002480000026 · Cited by 71
Phagocytosis: what’s on the menu?
Lancaster, C. E., Ho, C. Y., Hipolito, V. E. B., Botelho, R. J., & Terebiznik, M. R. (2019) · Biochemistry and Cell Biology · doi:10.1139/bcb-2018-0008 · Cited by 49
Blom, J. F., Zimmermann, Y. S., Ammann, T., & Pernthaler, J. (2010) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01455-10 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Hahn, M. W., Moore, E. R. B., & Höfle, M. G.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-35
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2096633192
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial Filament Formation, a Defense Mechanism against Flagellate Grazing, Is Growth Rate Controlled in Bacteria of Different Phyla. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.65.1.25-35.1999
- The paper
- Hahn, M. W., Moore, E. R. B., & Höfle, M. G. (1999). Bacterial Filament Formation, a Defense Mechanism against Flagellate Grazing, Is Growth Rate Controlled in Bacteria of Different Phyla. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.65.1.25-35.1999
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.