The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antimicrobial Actions of Degraded and Native Chitosan against Spoilage Organisms in Laboratory Media and Foods
Open accessAbstract
The objective of this study was to determine whether chitosan (poly-β-1,4-glucosamine) and hydrolysates of chitosan can be used as novel preservatives in foods. Chitosan was hydrolyzed by using oxidative-reductive degradation, crude papaya latex, and lysozyme. Mild hydrolysis of chitosan resulted in improved microbial inactivation in saline and greater inhibition of growth of several spoilage yeasts in laboratory media, but highly degraded products of chitosan exhibited no antimicrobial activity. In pasteurized apple-elderflower juice stored at 7°C, addition of 0.3 g of chitosan per liter eliminated yeasts entirely for the duration of the experiment (13 days), while the total counts and the lactic acid bacterial counts increased at a slower rate than they increased in the control. Addition of 0.3 or 1.0 g of chitosan per kg had no effect on the microbial flora of houmous, a chickpea dip; in the presence of 5.0 g of chitosan per kg, bacterial growth but not yeast growth was substantially reduced compared with growth in control dip stored at 7°C for 6 days. Improved antimicrobial potency of chitosan hydrolysates like that observed in the saline and laboratory medium experiments was not observed in juice and dip experiments. We concluded that native chitosan has potential for use as a preservative in certain types of food but that the increase in antimicrobial activity that occurs following partial hydrolysis is too small to justify the extra processing involved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kendra, D. F., & Hadwiger, L. A. (1984) · Experimental Mycology · doi:10.1016/0147-5975(84)90013-6 · Cited by 411
Effects of chitosan, pectic acid, lysozyme, and chitinase on the growth of several phytopathogens.
HIRANO, S., & NAGAO, N. (1989) · Agricultural and Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1271/bbb1961.53.3065 · Cited by 203 · cited 1×
“The results of Hirano and Nagao (7) also suggested that low-molecularweight chitosan in an agar system inhibited a range of phytopathogenic fungi more effectively than high-molecular-weight chitosan inhibited the organisms, although low-molecularweight chitosan was not defined.”
Background
Cited by
Chitosan as antimicrobial agent: applications and mode of action.
Rabea, E. I., Badawy, M. E.-T., Stevens, C. V., Smagghe, G., & Steurbaut, W. (2003) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm034130m · Cited by 3,123
Perspectives for chitosan based antimicrobial films in food applications
Dutta, P. K., Tripathi, S., Mehrotra, G. K., & Dutta, J. (2009) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.11.047 · Cited by 1,454
Chitosan disrupts the barrier properties of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria
Helander, I. M., Nurmiaho-Lassila, E.-L., Ahvenainen, R., Rhoades, J., & Roller, S. (2001) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(01)00609-2 · Cited by 1,373
Self-citationChitosan: an update on potential biomedical and pharmaceutical applications.
Cheung, R., Ng, T., Wong, J., & Chan, W. (2015) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md13085156 · Cited by 1,297
Devlieghere, F., Vermeulen, A., & Debevere, J. (2004) · Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.fm.2004.02.008 · Cited by 908
Metadata
- Authors
- Rhoades, J., & Roller, S.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 80-86
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2151371472
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial Actions of Degraded and Native Chitosan against Spoilage Organisms in Laboratory Media and Foods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.66.1.80-86.2000
- The paper
- Rhoades, J., & Roller, S. (2000). Antimicrobial Actions of Degraded and Native Chitosan against Spoilage Organisms in Laboratory Media and Foods. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.66.1.80-86.2000
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.