The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of Acid Mine Drainage Microbial Communities in Physically and Geochemically Distinct Ecosystems
Open accessAbstract
This study presents population analyses of microbial communities inhabiting a site of extreme acid mine drainage (AMD) production. The site is the inactive underground Richmond mine at Iron Mountain, Calif., where the weathering of a massive sulfide ore body (mostly pyrite) produces solutions with pHs of ∼0.5 to ∼1.0. Here we used a suite of oligonucleotide probes, designed from molecular data recently acquired from the site, to analyze a number of microbial environments by fluorescent in situ hybridization. Microbial-community analyses were correlated with geochemical and mineralogical data from those environments. The environments investigated were within the ore body and thus at the site of pyrite dissolution, as opposed to environments that occur downstream of the dissolution. Few organism types, as defined by the specificities of the oligonucleotide probes, dominated the microbial communities. The majority of the dominant organisms detected were newly discovered or organisms only recently associated with acid-leaching environments. “ Ferroplasma ” spp. were detected in many of the communities and were particularly dominant in environments of lowest pH and highest ionic strength. Leptospirillum spp. were also detected in many slime and pyrite-dominated environments. In samples of an unusual subaerial slime, a new uncultured Leptospirillum sp. dominated. Sulfobacillus spp. were detected as a prominent inhabitant in warmer (∼43°C) environments. The information gathered here is critical for determining organisms important to AMD production at Iron Mountain and for directing future studies of this process. The findings presented here also have relevance to the microbiology of industrial bioleaching and to the understanding of geochemical iron and sulfur cycles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bioleaching: Metal solubilization by microorganisms
Bosecker, K. (1997) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.1997.tb00340.x · Cited by 962
Cited by
Community structure and metabolism through reconstruction of microbial genomes from the environment
Tyson, G. W., Chapman, J., Hugenholtz, P., Allen, E. E., Ram, R. J., Richardson, P. M., Solovyev, V. V., Rubin, E. M., Rokhsar, D. S., & Banfield, J. F. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02340 · Cited by 2,417
Self-citationMicrobial communities in acid mine drainage
Baker, B. J., & Banfield, J. F. (2003) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1016/s0168-6496(03)00028-x · Cited by 1,119
Self-citationMany Chemistries Could Be Used to Build Living Systems
Bains, W. (2004) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/153110704323175124 · Cited by 193
Microbial stratification in low pH oxic and suboxic macroscopic growths along an acid mine drainage
Méndez-García, C., Mesa, V., Sprenger, R. R., Richter, M., Diez, M. S., Solano, J., Bargiela, R., Golyshina, O. V., Manteca, Á., Ramos, J. L., et al. (2014) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2013.242 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Bond, P. L., Druschel, G. K., & Banfield, J. F.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4962-4971
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2138361239
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Acid Mine Drainage Microbial Communities in Physically and Geochemically Distinct Ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.66.11.4962-4971.2000
- The paper
- Bond, P. L., Druschel, G. K., & Banfield, J. F. (2000). Comparison of Acid Mine Drainage Microbial Communities in Physically and Geochemically Distinct Ecosystems. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.66.11.4962-4971.2000
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.