Cited by 962Metal Extraction and BioleachingMine drainage and remediation techniquesExtraction and Separation Processes

Bioleaching: Metal solubilization by microorganisms

Open access
Bosecker, Klaus·1997·FEMS Microbiology Reviews

Abstract

Bioleaching is a simple and effective technology for metal extraction from low-grade ores and mineral concentrates. Metal recovery from sulfide minerals is based on the activity of chemolithotrophic bacteria, mainly Thiobacillus ferrooxidans and T. thiooxidans, which convert insoluble metal sulfides into soluble metal sulfates. Non-sulfide ores and minerals can be treated by heterotrophic bacteria and by fungi. In these cases metal extraction is due to the production of organic acids and chelating and complexing compounds excreted into the environment. At present bioleaching is used essentially for the recovery of copper, uranium and gold, and the main techniques employed are heap, dump and in situ leaching. Tank leaching is practised for the treatment of refractory gold ores. Bioleaching has also some potential for metal recovery and detoxification of industrial waste products, sewage sludge and soil contaminated with heavy metals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1997.tb00340.x

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Heap leaching has been used at some mining facilities to enhance metal extraction from low-grade sulfidic ores of copper, gold, uranium and zinc.

    “Heap leaching has been used at some mining facilities to enhance metal extraction from low-grade sulfidic ores of copper, gold, uranium and zinc [59][60][61].”

    From Strategizing carbon-neutral mines: A case for pilot projects (2014) · cites this paper as [60]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bosecker, K.
Affiliations
Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (DE)
Corresponding author
Bosecker, Klaus
Venue
FEMS Microbiology Reviews
Published
1997-07
Volume
20
Issue
3-4
Pages
591-604
ISSN
  • 0168-6445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1574-6976
OpenAlex
W2105769874
Cited by
962
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 37
FWCI
5.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
FEMS Microbiology Reviews (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Metal Extraction and Bioleaching
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Mine drainage and remediation techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
Keywords
bioleaching, metal solubilization, metal extraction, sulfide minerals, Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans, chemolithotrophic bacteria, heterotrophic bacteria, fungi, organic acids, chelating agents, copper recovery, uranium recovery, gold recovery, heap leaching, dump leaching, in-situ leaching, refractory gold ores, heavy metal detoxification, sewage sludge, soil contamination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review