The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Aspects of Bioavailability of Mercury for Methylation in Pure Cultures of Desulfobulbus propionicus (1pr3)
Open accessAbstract
We have previously hypothesized that sulfide inhibits Hg methylation by decreasing its bioavailability to sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB), the important methylators of Hg in natural sediments. With a view to designing a bioassay to test this hypothesis, we investigated a number of aspects of Hg methylation by the SRB Desulfobulbus propionicus , including (i) the relationship between cell density and methylmercury (MeHg) production, (ii) the time course of Hg methylation relative to growth stage, (iii) changes in the bioavailability of an added inorganic Hg (Hg I ) spike over time, and (iv) the dependence of methylation on the concentration of dissolved Hg I present in the culture. We then tested the effect of sulfide on MeHg production by this microorganism. These experiments demonstrated that under conditions of equal bioavailability, per-cell MeHg production was constant through log-phase culture growth. However, the methylation rate of a new Hg spike dramatically decreased after the first 5 h. This result was seen whether methylation rate was expressed as a fraction of the total added Hg or the filtered Hg I concentration, which suggests that Hg bioavailability decreased through both changes in Hg complexation and formation of solid phases. At low sulfide concentration, MeHg production was linearly related to the concentration of filtered Hg I . The methylation of filtered Hg I decreased about fourfold as sulfide concentration was increased from 10 −6 to 10 −3 M. This decline is consistent with a decrease in the bioavailability of Hg I , possibly due to a decline in the dissolved neutral complex, HgS 0 .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bacterial mercury resistance from atoms to ecosystems
Barkay, T., Miller, S. M., & Summers, A. O. (2003) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0168-6445(03)00046-9 · Cited by 1,054
Mercury Methylation by Novel Microorganisms from New Environments
Gilmour, C. C., Podar, M., Bullock, A. L., Graham, A. M., Brown, S. D., Somenahally, A. C., Johs, A., Hurt, R. A., Bailey, K. L., & Elias, D. A. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es403075t · Cited by 734
Self-citationHot Spots and Hot Moments in Riparian Zones: Potential for Improved Water Quality Management1
Vidon, P., Allan, C., Burns, D., Duval, T. P., Gurwick, N., Inamdar, S., Lowrance, R., Okay, J., Scott, D., & Sebestyen, S. (2010) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00420.x · Cited by 508
Benoit, J. M., Gilmour, C. C., & Mason, R. P. (2001) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es001415n · Cited by 301
Self-citationGeochemistry of Mercury in the Environment
Fitzgerald, W. F., & Lamborg, C. H. (2014) · Treatise on Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-095975-7.00904-9 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Benoit, J. M., Gilmour, C. C., & Mason, R. P.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-58
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2109231891
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aspects of Bioavailability of Mercury for Methylation in Pure Cultures of Desulfobulbus propionicus (1pr3). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.67.1.51-58.2001
- The paper
- Benoit, J. M., Gilmour, C. C., & Mason, R. P. (2001). Aspects of Bioavailability of Mercury for Methylation in Pure Cultures of Desulfobulbus propionicus (1pr3). Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.67.1.51-58.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.