The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bulk and Rhizosphere Soil Bacterial Communities Studied by Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis: Plant-Dependent Enrichment and Seasonal Shifts Revealed
Open accessAbstract
The bacterial rhizosphere communities of three host plants of the pathogenic fungus Verticillium dahliae , field-grown strawberry ( Fragaria ananassa Duch.), oilseed rape ( Brassica napus L.), and potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.), were analyzed. We aimed to determine the degree to which the rhizosphere effect is plant dependent and whether this effect would be increased by growing the same crops in two consecutive years. Rhizosphere or soil samples were taken five times over the vegetation periods. To allow a cultivation-independent analysis, total community DNA was extracted from the microbial pellet recovered from root or soil samples. 16S rDNA fragments amplified by PCR from soil or rhizosphere bacterium DNA were analyzed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). The DGGE fingerprints showed plant-dependent shifts in the relative abundance of bacterial populations in the rhizosphere which became more pronounced in the second year. DGGE patterns of oilseed rape and potato rhizosphere communities were more similar to each other than to the strawberry patterns. In both years seasonal shifts in the abundance and composition of the bacterial rhizosphere populations were observed. Independent of the plant species, the patterns of the first sampling times for both years were characterized by the absence of some of the bands which became dominant at the following sampling times. Bacillus megaterium and Arthrobacter sp. were found as predominant populations in bulk soils. Sequencing of dominant bands excised from the rhizosphere patterns revealed that 6 out of 10 bands resembled gram-positive bacteria. Nocardia populations were identified as strawberry-specific bands.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mahaffee, W. F., & Kloepper, J. W. (1997) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s002489900050 · Cited by 254
Cited by
Garbeva, P., van Veen, J. A., & van Elsas, J. D. (2004) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.012604.135455 · Cited by 1,458
Plant root-microbe communication in shaping root microbiomes
Lareen, A., Burton, F., & Schäfer, P. (2016) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-015-0417-8 · Cited by 668
Unravelling rhizosphere–microbial interactions: opportunities and limitations
Singh, B. K., Millard, P., Whiteley, A. S., & Murrell, J. C. (2004) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2004.06.008 · Cited by 503
The rhizosphere revisited: root microbiomics
Bakker, P. A. H. M., Berendsen, R. L., Doornbos, R. F., Wintermans, P. C. A., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (2013) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2013.00165 · Cited by 490
Hinsinger, P., Betencourt, E., Bernard, L., Brauman, A., Plassard, C., Shen, J., Tang, X., & Zhang, F. (2011) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.111.175331 · Cited by 474
Metadata
- Authors
- Smalla, K., Wieland, G., Buchner, A., Zock, A., Parzy, J., Kaiser, S., Roskot, N., Heuer, H., & Berg, G.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4742-4751
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2132291466
- Cited by
- 1,185
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 36.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bulk and Rhizosphere Soil Bacterial Communities Studied by Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis: Plant-Dependent Enrichment and Seasonal Shifts Revealed. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.67.10.4742-4751.2001
- The paper
- Smalla, K., Wieland, G., Buchner, A., Zock, A., Parzy, J., Kaiser, S., Roskot, N., Heuer, H., & Berg, G. (2001). Bulk and Rhizosphere Soil Bacterial Communities Studied by Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis: Plant-Dependent Enrichment and Seasonal Shifts Revealed. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.67.10.4742-4751.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.