The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strain with Enhanced Resistance to Phenolic Fermentation Inhibitors in Lignocellulose Hydrolysates by Heterologous Expression of Laccase
Open accessAbstract
To improve production of fuel ethanol from renewable raw materials, laccase from the white rot fungus Trametes versicolor was expressed under control of the PGK1 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to increase its resistance to phenolic inhibitors in lignocellulose hydrolysates. It was found that the laccase activity could be enhanced twofold by simultaneous overexpression of the homologous t -SNARE Sso2p. The factors affecting the level of active laccase obtained, besides the cultivation temperature, included pH and aeration. Laccase-expressing and Sso2p-overexpressing S. cerevisiae was cultivated in the presence of coniferyl aldehyde to examine resistance to lignocellulose-derived phenolic fermentation inhibitors. The laccase-producing transformant had the ability to convert coniferyl aldehyde at a faster rate than a control transformant not expressing laccase, which enabled faster growth and ethanol formation. The laccase-producing transformant was also able to ferment a dilute acid spruce hydrolysate at a faster rate than the control transformant. A decrease in the content of low-molecular-mass aromatic compounds, accompanied by an increase in the content of high-molecular-mass compounds, was observed during fermentation with the laccase-expressing strain, illustrating that laccase was active even at the very low levels of oxygen supplied. Our results demonstrate the importance of phenolic compounds as fermentation inhibitors and the advantage of using laccase-expressing yeast strains for producing ethanol from lignocellulose.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates for ethanol production
Olsson, L., & Hahn-Hägerdal, B. (1996) · Enzyme and Microbial Technology · doi:10.1016/0141-0229(95)00157-3 · Cited by 783
Cited by
Removal of synthetic dyes from wastewaters: a review
Forgacs, E., Cserháti, T., & Oros, G. (2004) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2004.02.001 · Cited by 3,008
Jönsson, L. J., & Martín, C. (2016) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.009 · Cited by 2,147
Self-citationBioconversion of lignocellulose: inhibitors and detoxification
Jönsson, L. J., Alriksson, B., & Nilvebrant, N.-O. (2013) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/1754-6834-6-16 · Cited by 1,382
Laccases and their natural mediators: Biotechnological tools for sustainable eco-friendly processes
Cañas, A. I., & Camarero, S. (2010) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.05.002 · Cited by 710
Fungal dye decolourization: Recent advances and future potential
KAUSHIK, P., & MALIK, A. (2009) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2008.05.010 · Cited by 522
Metadata
- Authors
- Larsson, S., Cassland, P., & Jönsson, L. J.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1163-1170
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2117939157
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strain with Enhanced Resistance to Phenolic Fermentation Inhibitors in Lignocellulose Hydrolysates by Heterologous Expression of Laccase. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.67.3.1163-1170.2001
- The paper
- Larsson, S., Cassland, P., & Jönsson, L. J. (2001). Development of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strain with Enhanced Resistance to Phenolic Fermentation Inhibitors in Lignocellulose Hydrolysates by Heterologous Expression of Laccase. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.67.3.1163-1170.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.