The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Surface Binding of Aflatoxin B 1 by Lactic Acid Bacteria
Open accessAbstract
Specific lactic acid bacterial strains remove toxins from liquid media by physical binding. The stability of the aflatoxin B 1 complexes formed with 12 bacterial strains in both viable and nonviable (heat- or acid-treated) forms was assessed by repetitive aqueous extraction. By the fifth extraction, up to 71% of the total aflatoxin B 1 remained bound. Nonviable bacteria retained the highest amount of aflatoxin B 1 . Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG (ATCC 53103) and L. rhamnosus strain LC-705 (DSM 7061) removed aflatoxin B 1 from solution most efficiently and were selected for further study. The accessibility of bound aflatoxin B 1 to an antibody in an indirect competitive inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay suggests that surface components of these bacteria are involved in binding. Further evidence is the recovery of around 90% of the bound aflatoxin from the bacteria by solvent extraction. Autoclaving and sonication did not release any detectable aflatoxin B 1 . Variation in temperature (4 to 37°C) and pH (2 to 10) did not have any significant effect on the amount of aflatoxin B 1 released. Binding of aflatoxin B 1 appears to be predominantly extracellular for viable and heat-treated bacteria. Acid treatment may permit intracellular binding. In all cases, binding is of a reversible nature, but the stability of the complexes formed depends on strain, treatment, and environmental conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Functional food science and gastrointestinal physiology and function
Salminen, S., Bouley, C., Boutron, M.-C., Cummings, J. H., Franck, A., Gibson, G. R., Isolauri, E., Moreau, M.-C., Roberfroid, M., & Rowland, I. (1998) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19980108 · Cited by 1,398
Self-citation
Cited by
Rushing, B. R., & Selim, M. I. (2019) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2018.11.047 · Cited by 989
Lactic acid bacteria–Potential for control of mould growth and mycotoxins: A review
Dalié, D. K. D., Deschamps, A. M., & Richard-Forget, F. (2010) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.07.011 · Cited by 705
Antifungal lactic acid bacteria as biopreservatives
Schnürer, J., & Magnusson, J. (2005) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2004.02.014 · Cited by 702
Impact of food processing and detoxification treatments on mycotoxin contamination
Karlovsky, P., Suman, M., Berthiller, F., De Meester, J., Eisenbrand, G., Perrin, I., Oswald, I. P., Speijers, G., Chiodini, A., Recker, T., et al. (2016) · Mycotoxin Research · doi:10.1007/s12550-016-0257-7 · Cited by 689
Detoxification of patulin and ochratoxin A, two abundant mycotoxins, by lactic acid bacteria
Fuchs, S., Sontag, G., Stidl, R., Ehrlich, V., Kundi, M., & Knasmüller, S. (2008) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2007.10.008 · Cited by 345
Metadata
- Authors
- Haskard, C. A., El-Nezami, H. S., Kankaanpää, P. E., Salminen, S., & Ahokas, J. T.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3086-3091
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1996350503
- Cited by
- 535
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Surface Binding of Aflatoxin B 1 by Lactic Acid Bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.67.7.3086-3091.2001
- The paper
- Haskard, C. A., El-Nezami, H. S., Kankaanpää, P. E., Salminen, S., & Ahokas, J. T. (2001). Surface Binding of Aflatoxin B 1 by Lactic Acid Bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.67.7.3086-3091.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
