The DOI matches its Crossref record; 123 of the 123 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of food processing and detoxification treatments on mycotoxin contamination
Open accessAbstract
Mycotoxins are fungal metabolites commonly occurring in food, which pose a health risk to the consumer. Maximum levels for major mycotoxins allowed in food have been established worldwide. Good agricultural practices, plant disease management, and adequate storage conditions limit mycotoxin levels in the food chain yet do not eliminate mycotoxins completely. Food processing can further reduce mycotoxin levels by physical removal and decontamination by chemical or enzymatic transformation of mycotoxins into less toxic products. Physical removal of mycotoxins is very efficient: manual sorting of grains, nuts, and fruits by farmers as well as automatic sorting by the industry significantly lowers the mean mycotoxin content. Further processing such as milling, steeping, and extrusion can also reduce mycotoxin content. Mycotoxins can be detoxified chemically by reacting with food components and technical aids; these reactions are facilitated by high temperature and alkaline or acidic conditions. Detoxification of mycotoxins can also be achieved enzymatically. Some enzymes able to transform mycotoxins naturally occur in food commodities or are produced during fermentation but more efficient detoxification can be achieved by deliberate introduction of purified enzymes. We recommend integrating evaluation of processing technologies for their impact on mycotoxins into risk management. Processing steps proven to mitigate mycotoxin contamination should be used whenever necessary. Development of detoxification technologies for high-risk commodities should be a priority for research. While physical techniques currently offer the most efficient post-harvest reduction of mycotoxin content in food, biotechnology possesses the largest potential for future developments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
International Agency for Research on Cancer
National Cancer Institute (2020) · Definitions · doi:10.32388/pfg7jq · Cited by 9,435
Bennett, J. W., & Klich, M. (2003) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.16.3.497-516.2003 · Cited by 3,127
Some traditional herbal medicines, some mycotoxins, naphthalene and styrene.
Anttila, A., Bhat, R. V., Bond, J. A., Borghoff, S. J., Bosch, F. X., Carlson, G. P., Castegnaro, M., Cruzan, G., Gelderblom, W. C. A., Hass, U., et al. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 1,674
Some traditional herbal medicines, some mycotoxins, naphthalene and styrene.
(2002) · PubMed Central · Cited by 1,079
Strategies to Prevent Mycotoxin Contamination of Food and Animal Feed: A Review
Kabak, B., Dobson, A. D. W., & Var, I. (2006) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408390500436185 · Cited by 897
Regulations relating to mycotoxins in food: Perspectives in a global and European context
van Egmond, H. P., Schothorst, R. C., & Jonker, M. A. (2007) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-007-1317-9 · Cited by 738
Stability of mycotoxins during food processing
Bullerman, L. B., & Bianchini, A. (2007) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.07.035 · Cited by 651
Surface Binding of Aflatoxin B 1 by Lactic Acid Bacteria
Haskard, C. A., El-Nezami, H. S., Kankaanpää, P. E., Salminen, S., & Ahokas, J. T. (2001) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.67.7.3086-3091.2001 · Cited by 535
Kavlock, R., Chandler, K., Houck, K., Hunter, S., Judson, R., Kleinstreuer, N., Knudsen, T., Martin, M., Padilla, S., Reif, D., et al. (2012) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx3000939 · Cited by 494
Scientific Opinion on the risks for public health related to the presence of zearalenone in food
Chain, E. P. O. C. I. T. F. (2011) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2197 · Cited by 490
Cited by
Worldwide aflatoxin contamination of agricultural products and foods: From occurrence to control
Jallow, A., Xie, H., Tang, X., Qi, Z., & Li, P. (2021) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12734 · Cited by 363
Lactic acid bacteria as antifungal and anti-mycotoxigenic agents: A comprehensive review
Sadiq, F. A., Yan, B., Tian, F., Zhao, J., Zhang, H., & Chen, W. (2019) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12481 · Cited by 313
Voidarou, C., Antoniadou, Μ., Rozos, G., Tzora, A., Skoufos, I., Varzakas, T., Lagiou, A., & Bezirtzoglou, E. (2020) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods10010069 · Cited by 281
The use of plant extracts and their phytochemicals for control of toxigenic fungi and mycotoxins
Makhuvele, R., Naidu, K., Gbashi, S., Thipe, V. C., Adebo, O. A., & Njobeh, P. B. (2020) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05291 · Cited by 176
The efficiency of lactic acid bacteria against pathogenic fungi and mycotoxins
Perczak, A., Goliński, P., Bryła, M., & Waśkiewicz, A. (2018) · Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology · doi:10.2478/aiht-2018-69-3051 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Karlovsky, P., Suman, M., Berthiller, F., De Meester, J., Eisenbrand, G., Perrin, I., Oswald, I. P., Speijers, G., Chiodini, A., Recker, T., & Dussort, P.
- Venue
- Mycotoxin Research
- Published
- 2016-08-23
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 179-205
- ISSN
- 0178-7888 (ISSN-L)
- 1867-1632
- OpenAlex
- W2515603318
- Cited by
- 689
- References
- 123
- FWCI
- 52.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of food processing and detoxification treatments on mycotoxin contamination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s12550-016-0257-7
- The paper
- Karlovsky, P., Suman, M., Berthiller, F., De Meester, J., Eisenbrand, G., Perrin, I., Oswald, I. P., Speijers, G., Chiodini, A., Recker, T., & Dussort, P. (2016). Impact of food processing and detoxification treatments on mycotoxin contamination. Mycotoxin Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12550-016-0257-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.