The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phylogenetic Composition of Bacterioplankton Assemblages from the Arctic Ocean
Open accessAbstract
We analyzed the phylogenetic composition of bacterioplankton assemblages in 11 Arctic Ocean samples collected over three seasons (winter-spring 1995, summer 1996, and summer-fall 1997) by sequencing cloned fragments of 16S rRNA genes. The sequencing effort was directed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) screening of samples and the clone libraries. Sequences of 88 clones fell into seven major lineages of the domain Bacteria: α (36%)-, γ (32%)-, δ (14%)-, and ε (1%)-Proteobacteria;Cytophaga-Flexibacter-Bacteroides spp. (9%);Verrucomicrobium spp. (6%); and green nonsulfur bacteria (2%). A total of 34% of the cloned sequences (excluding clones in the SAR11 and Roseobacter groups) had sequence similarities that were <94% compared to previously reported sequences, indicating the presence of novel sequences. DGGE fingerprints of the selected samples showed that most of the bands were common to all samples in all three seasons. However, additional bands representing sequences related to Cytophaga and Polaribacter species were found in samples collected during the summer and fall. Of the clones in a library generated from one sample collected in spring of 1995, 50% were the same and were most closely affiliated (99% similarity) with Alteromonas macleodii, while 50% of the clones in another sample were most closely affiliated (90 to 96% similarity) with Oceanospirillum sp. The majority of the cloned sequences were most closely related to uncultured, environmental sequences. Prominent among these were members of the SAR11 group. Differences between mixed-layer and halocline samples were apparent in DGGE fingerprints and clone libraries. Sequences related to α-Proteobacteria(dominated by SAR11) were abundant (52%) in samples from the mixed layer, while sequences related to γ-proteobacteria were more abundant (44%) in halocline samples. Two bands corresponding to sequences related to SAR307 (common in deep water) and the high-G+C gram-positive bacteria were characteristic of the halocline samples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
UniFrac: a New Phylogenetic Method for Comparing Microbial Communities
Lozupone, C., & Knight, R. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.12.8228-8235.2005 · Cited by 8,227
The Uncultured Microbial Majority
Rappé, M. S., & Giovannoni, S. J. (2003) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090759 · Cited by 2,017
Zaballos, M., López-López, A., Ovreas, L., Bartual, S. G., D'Auria, G., Alba, J. C., Legault, B., Pushker, R., Daae, F. L., & RodrÃguez-Valera, F. (2006) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00060.x · Cited by 1,249
Cultivation of the ubiquitous SAR11 marine bacterioplankton clade
Rappé, M. S., Connon, S. A., Vergin, K. L., & Giovannoni, S. J. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00917 · Cited by 1,018
PCR-DGGE fingerprinting: novel strategies for detection of microbes in food
Ercolini, D. (2004) · Journal of Microbiological Methods · doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2003.11.006 · Cited by 624
Metadata
- Authors
- Bano, N., & Hollibaugh, J. T.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 505-518
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2158897609
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogenetic Composition of Bacterioplankton Assemblages from the Arctic Ocean. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.68.2.505-518.2002
- The paper
- Bano, N., & Hollibaugh, J. T. (2002). Phylogenetic Composition of Bacterioplankton Assemblages from the Arctic Ocean. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.68.2.505-518.2002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.