Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 585

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biodiversity of Denitrifying and Dinitrogen-Fixing Bacteria in an Acid Forest Soil

Open access
Rösch, Christopher, Mergel, Alexander, Bothe, Hermann·2002·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Isolated soil DNA from an oak-hornbeam forest close to Cologne, Germany, was suitable for PCR amplification of gene segments coding for the 16S rRNA and nitrogenase reductase (NifH), nitrous oxide reductase (NosZ), cytochrome cd 1 -containing nitrite reductase (NirS), and Cu-containing nitrite reductase (NirK) of denitrification. For each gene segment, diverse PCR products were characterized by cloning and sequencing. None of the 16S rRNA gene sequences was identical to any deposited in the data banks, and therefore each of them belonged to a noncharacterized bacterium. In contrast, the analyzed clones of nifH gave only a few different sequences, which occurred many times, indicating a low level of species richness in the N 2 -fixing bacterial population in this soil. Identical nifH sequences were also detected in PCR amplification products of DNA of a soil approximately 600 km distant from the Cologne area. Whereas biodiversity was high in the case of nosZ , only a few different sequences were obtained with nirK . With respect to nirS , cloning and sequencing of the PCR products revealed that many false gene segments had been amplified with DNA from soil but not from cultured bacteria. With the 16S rRNA gene data, many sequences of uncultured bacteria belonging to the Acidobacterium phylum and actinomycetes showed up in the PCR products when isolated DNA was used as the template, whereas sequences obtained for nifH and for the denitrification genes were closely related to those of the proteobacteria. Although in such an experimental approach one has to cope with the enormous biodiversity in soils and only a few PCR products can be selected at random, the data suggest that denitrification and N 2 fixation are not genetic traits of most of the uncultured bacteria.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.68.8.3818-3829.2002

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 585

Metadata

Authors
Rösch, C., Mergel, A., & Bothe, H.
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2002-08
Volume
68
Issue
8
Pages
3818-3829
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W2160517962
Cited by
585
References
2
FWCI
16.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biodiversity of Denitrifying and Dinitrogen-Fixing Bacteria in an Acid Forest Soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.68.8.3818-3829.2002
The paper
Rösch, C., Mergel, A., & Bothe, H. (2002). Biodiversity of Denitrifying and Dinitrogen-Fixing Bacteria in an Acid Forest Soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.68.8.3818-3829.2002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.