The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-Throughput Methods for Culturing Microorganisms in Very-Low-Nutrient Media Yield Diverse New Marine Isolates
Open accessAbstract
Microbial diversity studies based on the cloning and sequencing of DNA from nature support the conclusion that only a fraction of the microbial diversity is currently represented in culture collections. Out of over 40 known prokaryotic phyla, only half have cultured representatives. In an effort to culture the uncultured phylotypes from oligotrophic marine ecosystems, we developed high-throughput culturing procedures that utilize the concept of extinction culturing to isolate cultures in small volumes of low-nutrient media. In these experiments, marine bacteria were isolated and cultivated at in situ substrate concentrations—typically 3 orders of magnitude less than common laboratory media. Microtiter plates and a newly developed procedure for making cell arrays were employed to raise the throughput rate and lower detection sensitivity, permitting cell enumeration from 200-μl aliquots of cultures with densities as low as 10 3 cells/ml. Approximately 2,500 extinction cultures from 11 separate samplings of marine bacterioplankton were screened over the course of 3 years. Up to 14% of the cells collected from coastal seawater were cultured by this method, which was 14- to 1,400-fold higher than the numbers obtained by traditional microbiological culturing techniques. Among the microorganisms cultured were four unique cell lineages that belong to previously uncultured or undescribed marine Proteobacteria clades known from environmental gene cloning studies. These cultures are related to the clades SAR11 (α subclass), OM43 (β subclass), SAR92 (γ subclass), and OM60/OM241 (γ subclass). This method proved successful for the cultivation of previously uncultured marine bacterioplankton that have consistently been found in marine clone libraries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phylogenetic analysis of ribosomal RNA operons from uncultivated coastal marine bacterioplankton
Suzuki, M. T., Béjà, O., Taylor, L. T., & DeLong, E. F. (2001) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1462-2920.2001.00198.x · Cited by 167
Cited by
Persister cells, dormancy and infectious disease
Lewis, K. (2007) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1557 · Cited by 2,052
Zengler, K., Toledo, G., Rappé, M., Elkins, J., Mathur, E. J., Short, J. M., & Keller, M. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.252630999 · Cited by 796
Eichorst, S. A., Breznak, J. A., & Schmidt, T. M. (2007) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02140-06 · Cited by 334
The soil metagenome – a rich resource for the discovery of novel natural products
Daniel, R. (2004) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2004.04.005 · Cited by 334
Hahn, M. W., Lünsdorf, H., Wu, Q., Schauer, M., Höfle, M. G., Boenigk, J., & Stadler, P. (2003) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.69.3.1442-1451.2003 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Connon, S. A., & Giovannoni, S. J.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3878-3885
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2100359842
- Cited by
- 741
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-Throughput Methods for Culturing Microorganisms in Very-Low-Nutrient Media Yield Diverse New Marine Isolates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.68.8.3878-3885.2002
- The paper
- Connon, S. A., & Giovannoni, S. J. (2002). High-Throughput Methods for Culturing Microorganisms in Very-Low-Nutrient Media Yield Diverse New Marine Isolates. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.68.8.3878-3885.2002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.