The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Evidence for a Uniform Microbial Community in Sponges from Different Oceans
Open accessAbstract
Sponges (class Porifera) are evolutionarily ancient metazoans that populate the tropical oceans in great abundances but also occur in temperate regions and even in freshwater. Sponges contain large numbers of bacteria that are embedded within the animal matrix. The phylogeny of these bacteria and the evolutionary age of the interaction are virtually unknown. In order to provide insights into the species richness of the microbial community of sponges, we performed a comprehensive diversity survey based on 190 sponge-derived 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequences. The sponges Aplysina aerophoba and Theonella swinhoei were chosen for construction of the bacterial 16S rDNA library because they are taxonomically distantly related and they populate nonoverlapping geographic regions. In both sponges, a uniform microbial community was discovered whose phylogenetic signature is distinctly different from that of marine plankton or marine sediments. Altogether 14 monophyletic, sponge-specific sequence clusters were identified that belong to at least seven different bacterial divisions. By definition, the sequences of each cluster are more closely related to each other than to a sequence from nonsponge sources. These monophyletic clusters comprise 70% of all publicly available sponge-derived 16S rDNA sequences, reflecting the generality of the observed phenomenon. This shared microbial fraction represents the smallest common denominator of the sponges investigated in this study. Bacteria that are exclusively found in certain host species or that occur only transiently would have been missed. A picture emerges where sponges can be viewed as highly concentrated reservoirs of so far uncultured and elusive marine microorganisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electron microscope study of the association between some sponges and bacteria
Vacelet, J., & Donadey, C. (1977) · Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology · doi:10.1016/0022-0981(77)90038-7 · Cited by 481
Cited by
The Uncultured Microbial Majority
Rappé, M. S., & Giovannoni, S. J. (2003) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090759 · Cited by 2,017
The functional roles of marine sponges
Bell, J. J. (2008) · Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science · doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2008.05.002 · Cited by 760
Genomic insights into the marine sponge microbiome
Hentschel, U., Piel, J., Degnan, S. M., & Taylor, M. W. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2839 · Cited by 658
Self-citationDiscovery of novel metabolites from marine actinomycetes
Lam, K. S. (2006) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2006.03.004 · Cited by 539
Mehbub, M., Lei, J., Franco, C., & Zhang, W. (2014) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md12084539 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Hentschel, U., Hopke, J., Horn, M., Friedrich, A. B., Wagner, M., Hacker, J., & Moore, B. S.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4431-4440
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2110683314
- Cited by
- 703
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Evidence for a Uniform Microbial Community in Sponges from Different Oceans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.68.9.4431-4440.2002
- The paper
- Hentschel, U., Hopke, J., Horn, M., Friedrich, A. B., Wagner, M., Hacker, J., & Moore, B. S. (2002). Molecular Evidence for a Uniform Microbial Community in Sponges from Different Oceans. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.68.9.4431-4440.2002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.