Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 227

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Engineering Redox Cofactor Regeneration for Improved Pentose Fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Open access
Verho, Ritva, Londesborough, John, Penttilä, Merja, Richard, Peter·2003·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Pentose fermentation to ethanol with recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae is slow and has a low yield. A likely reason for this is that the catabolism of the pentoses d -xylose and l -arabinose through the corresponding fungal pathways creates an imbalance of redox cofactors. The process, although redox neutral, requires NADPH and NAD + , which have to be regenerated in separate processes. NADPH is normally generated through the oxidative part of the pentose phosphate pathway by the action of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase ( ZWF1 ). To facilitate NADPH regeneration, we expressed the recently discovered gene GDP1 , which codes for a fungal NADP + -dependent d -glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (NADP-GAPDH) (EC 1.2.1.13), in an S. cerevisiae strain with the d -xylose pathway. NADPH regeneration through an NADP-GAPDH is not linked to CO 2 production. The resulting strain fermented d -xylose to ethanol with a higher rate and yield than the corresponding strain without GDP1 ; i.e., the levels of the unwanted side products xylitol and CO 2 were lowered. The oxidative part of the pentose phosphate pathway is the main natural path for NADPH regeneration. However, use of this pathway causes wasteful CO 2 production and creates a redox imbalance on the path of anaerobic pentose fermentation to ethanol because it does not regenerate NAD + . The deletion of the gene ZWF1 (which codes for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase), in combination with overexpression of GDP1 further stimulated d -xylose fermentation with respect to rate and yield. Through genetic engineering of the redox reactions, the yeast strain was converted from a strain that produced mainly xylitol and CO 2 from d -xylose to a strain that produced mainly ethanol under anaerobic conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.69.10.5892-5897.2003

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 227

Metadata

Authors
Verho, R., Londesborough, J., Penttilä, M., & Richard, P.
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2003-10
Volume
69
Issue
10
Pages
5892-5897
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W2096202610
Cited by
227
References
0
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engineering Redox Cofactor Regeneration for Improved Pentose Fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.69.10.5892-5897.2003
The paper
Verho, R., Londesborough, J., Penttilä, M., & Richard, P. (2003). Engineering Redox Cofactor Regeneration for Improved Pentose Fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.69.10.5892-5897.2003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.