The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diversity and Succession of the Intestinal Bacterial Community of the Maturing Broiler Chicken
Open accessAbstract
The diversity of bacterial floras in the ilea and ceca of chickens that were fed a vegetarian corn-soy broiler diet devoid of feed additives was examined by analysis of 1,230 partial 16S rRNA gene sequences. Nearly 70% of sequences from the ileum were related to those of Lactobacillus , with the majority of the rest being related to Clostridiaceae (11%), Streptococcus (6.5%), and Enterococcus (6.5%). In contrast, Clostridiaceae -related sequences (65%) were the most abundant group detected in the cecum, with the other most abundant sequences being related to Fusobacterium (14%), Lactobacillus (8%), and Bacteroides (5%). Statistical analysis comparing the compositions of the different 16S rRNA libraries revealed that population succession occurred during some sampling periods. The significant differences among cecal libraries at 3 and 7 days of age, at 14 to 28 days of age, and at 49 days of age indicated that successions occurred from a transient community to one of increasing complexity as the birds aged. Similarly, the ileum had a stable bacterial community structure for birds at 7 to 21 days of age and between 21 to 28 days of age, but there was a very unique community structure at 3 and 49 days of age. It was also revealed that the composition of the ileal and cecal libraries did not significantly differ when the birds were 3 days old, and in fact during the first 14 days of age, the cecal microflora was a subset of the ileal microflora. After this time, the ileum and cecum had significantly different library compositions, suggesting that each region developed its own unique bacterial community as the bird matured.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
THE POPULATION FREQUENCIES OF SPECIES AND THE ESTIMATION OF POPULATION PARAMETERS
GOOD, I. J. (1953) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/40.3-4.237 · Cited by 3,437
Molecular Analysis of Commensal Host-Microbial Relationships in the Intestine
Hooper, L. V., Wong, M. H., Thelin, A., Hansson, L., Falk, P. G., & Gordon, J. I. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.291.5505.881 · Cited by 2,202
[5] Rapid and sensitive sequence comparison with FASTP and FASTA
Pearson, W. R. (1990) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/0076-6879(90)83007-v · Cited by 1,946
Bias caused by template annealing in the amplification of mixtures of 16S rRNA genes by PCR
Suzuki, M. T., & Giovannoni, S. J. (1996) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.62.2.625-630.1996 · Cited by 1,881
Suau, A., Bonnet, R., Sutren, M., Godon, J.-J., Gibson, G. R., Collins, M. D., & Doré, J. (1999) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.65.11.4799-4807.1999 · Cited by 1,490
The microbiology of butyrate formation in the human colon
Pryde, S. E., Duncan, S. H., Hold, G. L., Stewart, C. S., & Flint, H. J. (2002) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11467.x · Cited by 1,320
The Role of Probiotic Cultures in the Control of Gastrointestinal Health
Rolfe, R. D. (2000) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/130.2.396s · Cited by 925
Complete genome sequence of Clostridium perfringens , an anaerobic flesh-eater
Shimizu, T., Ohtani, K., Hirakawa, H., Ohshima, K., Yamashita, A., Shiba, T., Ogasawara, N., Hattori, M., Kuhara, S., & Hayashi, H. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.022493799 · Cited by 725
Farrelly, V, Rainey, F. A., & Stackebrandt, E. (1995) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.61.7.2798-2801.1995 · Cited by 714
Cited by
Niewold, T. A. (2007) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/86.4.605 · Cited by 414
Exploring the avian gut microbiota: current trends and future directions
Waite, D. W., & Taylor, M. W. (2015) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00673 · Cited by 297
Interaction between chicken intestinal microbiota and protein digestion
Apajalahti, J., & Vienola, K. (2016) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.05.004 · Cited by 294
The effect of microbiome modulation on the intestinal health of poultry
Kogut, M. H. (2019) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.10.008 · Cited by 283
Suchodolski, J. S., Camacho, J., & Steiner, J. M. (2008) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00521.x · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, J., Idris, U., Harmon, B., Hofacre, C., Maurer, J. J., & Lee, M. D.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 6816-6824
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2013032478
- Cited by
- 818
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 35.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diversity and Succession of the Intestinal Bacterial Community of the Maturing Broiler Chicken. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.69.11.6816-6824.2003
- The paper
- Lu, J., Idris, U., Harmon, B., Hofacre, C., Maurer, J. J., & Lee, M. D. (2003). Diversity and Succession of the Intestinal Bacterial Community of the Maturing Broiler Chicken. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.69.11.6816-6824.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.