Cited by 519Listeria monocytogenes in Food SafetyBacterial biofilms and quorum sensingProbiotics and Fermented Foods

Variation in Biofilm Formation among Strains of Listeriamonocytogenes

Open access
Borucki, Monica K., Peppin, Jason D., White, David, Loge, Frank, Call, Douglas R.·2003·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Contamination of food by Listeria monocytogenes is thought to occur most frequently in food-processing environments where cells persist due to their ability to attach to stainless steel and other surfaces. Once attached these cells may produce multicellular biofilms that are resistant to disinfection and from which cells can become detached and contaminate food products. Because there is a correlation between virulence and serotype (and thus phylogenetic division) of L. monocytogenes, it is important to determine if there is a link between biofilm formation and disease incidence for L. monocytogenes. Eighty L. monocytogenes isolates were screened for biofilm formation to determine if there is a robust relationship between biofilm formation, phylogenic division, and persistence in the environment. Statistically significant differences were detected between phylogenetic divisions. Increased biofilm formation was observed in Division II strains (serotypes 1/2a and 1/2c), which are not normally associated with food-borne outbreaks. Differences in biofilm formation were also detected between persistent and nonpersistent strains isolated from bulk milk samples, with persistent strains showing increased biofilm formation relative to nonpersistent strains. There were no significant differences detected among serotypes. Exopolysaccharide production correlated with cell adherence for high-biofilm-producing strains. Scanning electron microscopy showed that a high-biofilm-forming strain produced a dense, three-dimensional structure, whereas a low-biofilm-forming strain produced a thin, patchy biofilm. These data are consistent with data on persistent strains forming biofilms but do not support a consistent relationship between enhanced biofilm formation and disease incidence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.69.12.7336-7342.2003

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In ruthenium red stain in milk agar plates, non-ropy colonies appear red, while ropy colonies from EPS producers remain white.

    “Non-ropy colonies appear red, while ropy colonies from EPS producers remain white [87].”

    From Lactic Acid Bacteria Exopolysaccharides Producers: A Sustainable Tool for Functional Foods (2021) · cites this paper as [87]

    The Methods describe ruthenium red staining on glass slides and in PVC microplates, and the Results discuss dye uptake by biofilms. Our copy does not describe ruthenium red staining on milk agar or say whether ropy and non-ropy colonies appear white or red (searched: ropy colonies, milk agar, colony morphology). (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Borucki, M. K., Peppin, J. D., White, D., Loge, F., & Call, D. R.
Affiliations
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
  • Washington State University (US)
  • Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2003-12
Volume
69
Issue
12
Pages
7336-7342
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W2163800706
Cited by
519
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 13
FWCI
8.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied and Environmental Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
Listeria monocytogenes, biofilm formation, serotypes, exopolysaccharide production, cell adhesion, persistent strains, food processing environments, food poisoning
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacteriological Techniques, Culture Media, Humans, Listeria monocytogenes, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Milk, Phylogeny, Polysaccharides, Bacterial, Polyvinyl Chloride, Serotyping, Stainless Steel, Biofilms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review