Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 482

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantitative Detection of Methanotrophs in Soil by Novel pmoA -Targeted Real-Time PCR Assays

Open access
Kolb, Steffen, Knief, Claudia, Stubner, Stephan, Conrad, Ralf·2003·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Methane oxidation in soils is mostly accomplished by methanotrophic bacteria. Little is known about the abundance of methanotrophs in soils, since quantification by cultivation and microscopic techniques is cumbersome. Comparison of 16S ribosomal DNA and pmoA (α subunit of the particulate methane monooxygenase) phylogenetic trees showed good correlation and revealed five distinct groups of methanotrophs within the α and γ subclasses of Proteobacteria : the Methylococcus group, the Methylobacter/Methylosarcina group, the Methylosinus group, the Methylocapsa group, and the forest clones group (a cluster of pmoA sequences retrieved from forest soils). We developed quantitative real-time PCR assays with SybrGreen for each of these five groups and for all methanotrophic bacteria by targeting the pmoA gene. Detection limits were between 10 1 and 10 2 target molecules per reaction for all assays. Real-time PCR analysis of soil samples spiked with cells of Methylococcus capsulatus , Methylomicrobium album , and Methylosinus trichosporium recovered almost all the added bacteria. Only the Methylosinus -specific assay recovered only 20% of added cells, possibly due to a lower lysis efficiency of type II methanotrophs. Analysis of the methanotrophic community structure in a flooded rice field soil showed (5.0 ± 1.4) × 10 6 pmoA molecules g −1 for all methanotrophs. The Methylosinus group was predominant (2.7 × 10 6 ± 1.1 × 10 6 target molecules g −1 ). In addition, bacteria of the Methylobacter/Methylosarcina group were abundant (2.0 × 10 6 ± 0.9 × 10 6 target molecules g of soil −1 ). On the other hand, pmoA affiliated with the forest clones and the Methylocapsa group was below the detection limit of 1.9 × 10 4 target molecules g of soil −1 . Our results showed that pmoA -targeted real-time PCR allowed fast and sensitive quantification of the five major groups of methanotrophs in soil. This approach will thus be useful for quantitative analysis of the community structure of methanotrophs in nature.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.69.5.2423-2429.2003

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

See all 482

Metadata

Authors
Kolb, S., Knief, C., Stubner, S., & Conrad, R.
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2003-05
Volume
69
Issue
5
Pages
2423-2429
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W2171619585
Cited by
482
References
34
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative Detection of Methanotrophs in Soil by Novel pmoA -Targeted Real-Time PCR Assays. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.69.5.2423-2429.2003
The paper
Kolb, S., Knief, C., Stubner, S., & Conrad, R. (2003). Quantitative Detection of Methanotrophs in Soil by Novel pmoA -Targeted Real-Time PCR Assays. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.69.5.2423-2429.2003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.