The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Improved Protocol for Quantification of Freshwater Actinobacteria by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
Open accessAbstract
We tested a previously described protocol for fluorescence in situ hybridization of marine bacterioplankton with horseradish peroxidase-labeled rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes and catalyzed reporter deposition (CARD-FISH) in plankton samples from different lakes. The fraction of Bacteria detected by CARD-FISH was significantly lower than after FISH with fluorescently monolabeled probes. In particular, the abundances of aquatic Actinobacteria were significantly underestimated. We thus developed a combined fixation and permeabilization protocol for CARD-FISH of freshwater samples. Enzymatic pretreatment of fixed cells was optimized for the controlled digestion of gram-positive cell walls without causing overall cell loss. Incubations with high concentrations of lysozyme (10 mg ml −1 ) followed by achromopeptidase (60 U ml −1 ) successfully permeabilized cell walls of Actinobacteria for subsequent CARD-FISH both in enrichment cultures and environmental samples. Between 72 and >99% (mean, 86%) of all Bacteria could be visualized with the improved assay in surface waters of four lakes. For freshwater samples, our method is thus superior to the CARD-FISH protocol for marine Bacteria (mean, 55%) and to FISH with directly fluorochrome labeled probes (mean, 67%). Actinobacterial abundances in the studied systems, as detected by the optimized protocol, ranged from 32 to >55% (mean, 45%). Our findings confirm that members of this lineage are among the numerically most important Bacteria of freshwater picoplankton.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Predation on prokaryotes in the water column and its ecological implications
Pernthaler, J. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1180 · Cited by 803
Self-citationWagner-Döbler, I., Ballhausen, B., Berger, M., Brinkhoff, T., Buchholz, I., Bunk, B., Cypionka, H., Daniel, R., Drepper, T., Gerdts, G., et al. (2010) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2009.94 · Cited by 271
Metagenomics uncovers a new group of low GC and ultra-small marine Actinobacteria
Ghai, R., Mizuno, C. M., Picazo, A., Camacho, A., & Rodriguez-Valera, F. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep02471 · Cited by 224
Constant, P., Chowdhury, S. P., Pratscher, J., & Conrad, R. (2010) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02130.x · Cited by 171
Antibiotics promote aggregation within aquatic bacterial communities
Corno, G., Coci, M., Giardina, M., Plechuk, S., Campanile, F., & Stefani, S. (2014) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00297 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Sekar, R., Pernthaler, A., Pernthaler, J., Warnecke, F., Posch, T., & Amann, R.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2928-2935
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2136142647
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Improved Protocol for Quantification of Freshwater Actinobacteria by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.69.5.2928-2935.2003
- The paper
- Sekar, R., Pernthaler, A., Pernthaler, J., Warnecke, F., Posch, T., & Amann, R. (2003). An Improved Protocol for Quantification of Freshwater Actinobacteria by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.69.5.2928-2935.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.