The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Differences in Hyporheic-Zone Microbial Community Structure along a Heavy-Metal Contamination Gradient
Open accessAbstract
The hyporheic zone of a river is nonphotic, has steep chemical and redox gradients, and has a heterotrophic food web based on the consumption of organic carbon entrained from downwelling surface water or from upwelling groundwater. The microbial communities in the hyporheic zone are an important component of these heterotrophic food webs and perform essential functions in lotic ecosystems. Using a suite of methods (denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, 16S rRNA phylogeny, phospholipid fatty acid analysis, direct microscopic enumeration, and quantitative PCR), we compared the microbial communities inhabiting the hyporheic zone of six different river sites that encompass a wide range of sediment metal loads resulting from large base-metal mining activity in the region. There was no correlation between sediment metal content and the total hyporheic microbial biomass present within each site. However, microbial community structure showed a significant linear relationship with the sediment metal loads. The abundances of four phylogenetic groups (groups I, II, III, and IV) most closely related to α-, β-, and γ-proteobacteria and the cyanobacteria, respectively, were determined. The sediment metal content gradient was positively correlated with group III abundance and negatively correlated with group II abundance. No correlation was apparent with regard to group I or IV abundance. This is the first documentation of a relationship between fluvially deposited heavy-metal contamination and hyporheic microbial community structure. The information presented here may be useful in predicting long-term effects of heavy-metal contamination in streams and provides a basis for further studies of metal effects on hyporheic microbial communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stegen, J. C., Fredrickson, J. K., Wilkins, M. J., Konopka, A. E., Nelson, W. C., Arntzen, E. V., Chrisler, W. B., Chu, R. K., Danczak, R. E., Fansler, S. J., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11237 · Cited by 409
Ujang, F. A., Roslan, A. M., Osman, N. A., Norman, A., Idris, J., Farid, M. A. A., Halmi, M. I. E., Gozan, M., & Hassan, M. A. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-97789-0 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Feris, K., Ramsey, P., Frazar, C., Moore, J. N., Gannon, J. E., & Holben, W. E.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 5563-5573
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2165136056
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differences in Hyporheic-Zone Microbial Community Structure along a Heavy-Metal Contamination Gradient. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.69.9.5563-5573.2003
- The paper
- Feris, K., Ramsey, P., Frazar, C., Moore, J. N., Gannon, J. E., & Holben, W. E. (2003). Differences in Hyporheic-Zone Microbial Community Structure along a Heavy-Metal Contamination Gradient. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.69.9.5563-5573.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.