Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 197

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improved Stress Tolerance of GroESL-Overproducing Lactococcus lactis and Probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei NFBC 338

Open access
Desmond, C., Fitzgerald, G. F., Stanton, C., Ross, R. P.·2004·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

The bacterial heat shock response is characterized by the elevated expression of a number of chaperone complexes. Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis revealed that GroEL expression in probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei NFBC 338 was increased under heat adaptation conditions (52°C for 15 min). Subsequently, the groESL operon of L. paracasei NFBC 338 was PCR amplified, and by using the nisin-inducible expression system, two plasmids, pGRO1 and pGRO2, were constructed on the basis of vectors pNZ8048 and pMSP3535, respectively. These vectors were transferred into Lactococcus lactis(pGRO1) and L. paracasei(pGRO2), and after induction with nisin, overexpressed GroEL represented 15 and 20% of the total cellular protein in each strain, respectively. Following heat shock treatment of lactococci (at 54°C) and lactobacilli (at 60°C), the heat-adapted cultures maintained the highest level of viability (5-log-unit increase, approximately) in each case, while it was found that the GroESL-overproducing strains performed only moderately better (1-log-unit increase) than the controls. On the other hand, the salt tolerance of both GroESL-overproducing strains (in 5 M NaCl) was similar to that of the parent cultures. Interestingly, both strains overproducing GroESL exhibited increased solvent tolerance, most notably, the ability to grow in the presence of butanol (0.5% [vol/vol]) for 5 h, while the viability of the parent strain declined. These results confirm the integral role of GroESL in solvent tolerance, and to a lesser extent, thermotolerance of lactic acid bacteria. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that technologically sensitive cultures, including certain probiotic lactobacilli, can potentially be manipulated to become more robust for survival under harsh conditions, such as food product development and gastrointestinal transit.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.70.10.5929-5936.2004

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 197

Metadata

Authors
Desmond, C., Fitzgerald, G. F., Stanton, C., & Ross, R. P.
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2004-10
Volume
70
Issue
10
Pages
5929-5936
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W2103177895
Cited by
197
References
4
FWCI
10.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved Stress Tolerance of GroESL-Overproducing Lactococcus lactis and Probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei NFBC 338. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.70.10.5929-5936.2004
The paper
Desmond, C., Fitzgerald, G. F., Stanton, C., & Ross, R. P. (2004). Improved Stress Tolerance of GroESL-Overproducing Lactococcus lactis and Probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei NFBC 338. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.70.10.5929-5936.2004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.