The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bacterial Succession in a Petroleum Land Treatment Unit
Open accessAbstract
Bacterial community dynamics were investigated in a land treatment unit (LTU) established at a site contaminated with highly weathered petroleum hydrocarbons in the C 10 to C 32 range. The treatment plot, 3,000 cubic yards of soil, was supplemented with nutrients and monitored weekly for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), soil water content, nutrient levels, and aerobic heterotrophic bacterial counts. Weekly soil samples were analyzed with 16S rRNA gene terminal restriction fragment (TRF) analysis to monitor bacterial community structure and dynamics during bioremediation. TPH degradation was rapid during the first 3 weeks and slowed for the remainder of the 24-week project. A sharp increase in plate counts was reported during the first 3 weeks, indicating an increase in biomass associated with petroleum degradation. Principal components analysis of TRF patterns revealed a series of sample clusters describing bacterial succession during the study. The largest shifts in bacterial community structure began as the TPH degradation rate slowed and the bacterial cell counts decreased. For the purpose of analyzing bacterial dynamics, phylotypes were generated by associating TRFs from three enzyme digests with 16S rRNA gene clones. Two phylotypes associated with Flavobacterium and Pseudomonas were dominant in TRF patterns from samples during rapid TPH degradation. After the TPH degradation rate slowed, four other phylotypes gained dominance in the community while Flavobacterium and Pseudomonas phylotypes decreased in abundance. These data suggest that specific phylotypes of bacteria were associated with the different phases of petroleum degradation in the LTU.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wu, M., Dick, W. A., Li, W., Wang, X., Yang, Q., Wang, T., Xu, L., Zhang, M., & Chen, L. (2016) · International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation · doi:10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.11.019 · Cited by 367
Kabelitz, N., Machackova, J., Imfeld, G., Brennerova, M., Pieper, D. H., Heipieper, H. J., & Junca, H. (2009) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-009-1868-0 · Cited by 57
Linking Performance with Microbial Community Characteristics in an Anaerobic Baffled Reactor
Ban, Q., Li, J., Zhang, L., Jha, A. K., & Nies, L. (2013) · Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s12010-013-0105-6 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaplan, C. W., & Kitts, C. L.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1777-1786
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2104884282
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial Succession in a Petroleum Land Treatment Unit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.70.3.1777-1786.2004
- The paper
- Kaplan, C. W., & Kitts, C. L. (2004). Bacterial Succession in a Petroleum Land Treatment Unit. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.70.3.1777-1786.2004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.