The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multivariate Analyses of Burkholderia Species in Soil: Effect of Crop and Land Use History
Open accessAbstract
The assessment of Burkholderia diversity in agricultural areas is important considering the potential use of this genus for agronomic and environmental applications. Therefore, the aim of this work was to ascertain how plant species and land use management drive the diversity of the genus Burkholderia . In a greenhouse experiment, different crops, i.e., maize, oat, barley, and grass, were planted in pots containing soils with different land use histories, i.e., maize monoculture, crop rotation, and permanent grassland, for three consecutive growth cycles. The diversity of Burkholderia spp. in the rhizosphere soil was assessed by genus-specific PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and analyzed by canonical correspondence analysis (CCA). CCA ordination plots showed that previous land use was the main factor affecting the composition of the Burkholderia community. Although most variation in the Burkholderia community structure was observed between the permanent grassland and agricultural areas, differences between the crop rotation and maize monoculture groups were also observed. Plant species affected Burkholderia community structure to a lesser extent than did land use history. Similarities were observed between Burkholderia populations associated with maize and grass, on the one hand, and between those associated with barley and oat, on the other hand. Additionally, CCA ordination plots demonstrated that these two groups (maize/grass versus barley/oat) had a negative correlation. The identification of bands from the DGGE patterns demonstrated that the species correlated with the environmental variables were mainly affiliated with Burkholderia species that are commonly isolated from soil, in particular Burkholderia glathei , B. caledonica , B. hospita , and B. caribiensis .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolution of Protein Molecules
JUKES, T. H., & CANTOR, C. R. (1969) · Mammalian Protein Metabolism · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3211-9.50009-7 · Cited by 11,032
Cited by
Understanding and enhancing soil biological health: the solution for reversing soil degradation
Lehman, R., Cambardella, C., Stott, D., Acosta-Martinez, V., Manter, D., Buyer, J., Maul, J., Smith, J., Collins, H., Halvorson, J., et al. (2015) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su7010988 · Cited by 449
Conservation Agriculture, Improving Soil Quality for Sustainable Production Systems?
Verhulst, N., Govaerts, B., Verachtert, E., Castellanos-Navarrete, A., Mezzalama, M., Wall, P. C., Chocobar, A., Deckers, J., & Sayre, K. D. (2010) · Food Security and Soil Quality · doi:10.1201/ebk1439800577-7 · Cited by 358
Crop rotational diversity increases disease suppressive capacity of soil microbiomes
Peralta, A. L., Sun, Y., McDaniel, M. D., & Lennon, J. T. (2018) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.2235 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Salles, J. F., van Veen, J. A., & van Elsas, J. D.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 4012-4020
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2140587548
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multivariate Analyses of Burkholderia Species in Soil: Effect of Crop and Land Use History. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.70.7.4012-4020.2004
- The paper
- Salles, J. F., van Veen, J. A., & van Elsas, J. D. (2004). Multivariate Analyses of Burkholderia Species in Soil: Effect of Crop and Land Use History. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.70.7.4012-4020.2004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.