The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Host Distributions of Uncultivated Fecal Bacteroidales Bacteria Reveal Genetic Markers for Fecal Source Identification
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of this study was to examine host distribution patterns among fecal bacteria in the order Bacteroidales , with the goal of using endemic sequences as markers for fecal source identification in aquatic environments. We analyzed Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene sequences from the feces of eight hosts: human, bovine, pig, horse, dog, cat, gull, and elk. Recovered sequences did not match database sequences, indicating high levels of uncultivated diversity. The analysis revealed both endemic and cosmopolitan distributions among the eight hosts. Ruminant, pig, and horse sequences tended to form host- or host group-specific clusters in a phylogenetic tree, while human, dog, cat, and gull sequences clustered together almost exclusively. Many of the human, dog, cat, and gull sequences fell within a large branch containing cultivated species from the genus Bacteroides . Most of the cultivated Bacteroides species had very close matches with multiple hosts and thus may not be useful targets for fecal source identification. A large branch containing cultivated members of the genus Prevotella included cloned sequences that were not closely related to cultivated Prevotella species. Most ruminant sequences formed clusters separate from the branches containing Bacteroides and Prevotella species. Host-specific sequences were identified for pigs and horses and were used to design PCR primers to identify pig and horse sources of fecal pollution in water. The primers successfully amplified fecal DNAs from their target hosts and did not amplify fecal DNAs from other species. Fecal bacteria endemic to the host species may result from evolution in different types of digestive systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hopkins, M. J., Sharp, R., & Macfarlane, G. T. (2001) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.48.2.198 · Cited by 577
Cited by
Kildare, B. J., Leutenegger, C. M., McSwain, B. S., Bambic, D. G., Rajal, V. B., & Wuertz, S. (2007) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2007.06.037 · Cited by 451
Performance of forty-one microbial source tracking methods: A twenty-seven lab evaluation study
Boehm, A. B., Van De Werfhorst, L. C., Griffith, J. F., Holden, P. A., Jay, J. A., Shanks, O. C., Wang, D., & Weisberg, S. B. (2013) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2012.12.046 · Cited by 313
Microbial source tracking of fecal pollution to coral reef lagoons of Norfolk Island, Australia
Vanderzalm, J., Currie, S., Smith, W., Metcalfe, S., Taylor, N., & Ahmed, W. (2024) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168906 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Dick, L. K., Bernhard, A. E., Brodeur, T. J., Santo Domingo, J. W., Simpson, J. M., Walters, S. P., & Field, K. G.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3184-3191
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2099478404
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Host Distributions of Uncultivated Fecal Bacteroidales Bacteria Reveal Genetic Markers for Fecal Source Identification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.71.6.3184-3191.2005
- The paper
- Dick, L. K., Bernhard, A. E., Brodeur, T. J., Santo Domingo, J. W., Simpson, J. M., Walters, S. P., & Field, K. G. (2005). Host Distributions of Uncultivated Fecal Bacteroidales Bacteria Reveal Genetic Markers for Fecal Source Identification. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.71.6.3184-3191.2005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.