The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Direct and Indirect Effects of Protist Predation on Population Size Structure of a Bacterial Strain with High Phenotypic Plasticity
Open accessAbstract
We studied the impact of grazing and substrate supply on the size structure of a freshwater bacterial strain (Flectobacillus sp.) which showed pronounced morphological plasticity. The cell length varied from 2 to >40 μm and encompassed rods, curved cells, and long filaments. Without grazers and with a sufficient substrate supply, bacteria grew mainly in the form of medium-sized rods (4 to 7 μm), with a smaller proportion (<10%) of filamentous forms. Grazing experiments with the bacterivorous flagellate Ochromonas sp. showed that freely suspended cells of <7 μm were highly vulnerable to grazers, whereas filamentous cells were resistant to grazing and became enriched during predation. A comparison of long-term growth in carbon-limited chemostats with and without grazers revealed that strikingly different bacterial populations developed: treatments with flagellates were composed of >80% filamentous cells. These attained a biomass comparable to that of populations in chemostats without grazers, which were composed of medium-sized rods and c-shaped cells. Carbon starvation resulted in a fast decrease in cell length and a shift towards small rods, which were highly vulnerable to grazing. Dialysis bag experiments in combination with continuous cultivation revealed that filament formation was significantly enhanced even without direct contact of bacteria with bacterivores and was thus probably stimulated by grazer excretory products.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacterial Persistence as a Phenotypic Switch
Balaban, N. Q., Merrin, J., Chait, R., Kowalik, L., & Leibler, S. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099390 · Cited by 2,952 · cited 1×
“Switching between different growth phases has also been shown to generate population heterogeneity (1).”
Background
Cited by
Stokke, R., Dahle, H., Roalkvam, I., Wissuwa, J., Daae, F. L., Tooming‐Klunderud, A., Thorseth, I. H., Pedersen, R. B., & Steen, I. H. (2015) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.12970 · Cited by 63
Phagocytosis: what’s on the menu?
Lancaster, C. E., Ho, C. Y., Hipolito, V. E. B., Botelho, R. J., & Terebiznik, M. R. (2019) · Biochemistry and Cell Biology · doi:10.1139/bcb-2018-0008 · Cited by 49
Corno, G., Villiger, J., & Pernthaler, J. (2013) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/12-1652.1 · Cited by 47
Self-citationBlom, J. F., Zimmermann, Y. S., Ammann, T., & Pernthaler, J. (2010) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01455-10 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Corno, G., & Jürgens, K.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 78-86
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2122081343
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct and Indirect Effects of Protist Predation on Population Size Structure of a Bacterial Strain with High Phenotypic Plasticity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.72.1.78-86.2006
- The paper
- Corno, G., & Jürgens, K. (2006). Direct and Indirect Effects of Protist Predation on Population Size Structure of a Bacterial Strain with High Phenotypic Plasticity. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.72.1.78-86.2006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.