The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Models for Consumption of Raw Vegetables Irrigated with Reclaimed Water
Abstract
Quantitative microbial risk assessment models for estimating the annual risk of enteric virus infection associated with consuming raw vegetables that have been overhead irrigated with nondisinfected secondary treated reclaimed water were constructed. We ran models for several different scenarios of crop type, viral concentration in effluent, and time since last irrigation event. The mean annual risk of infection was always less for cucumber than for broccoli, cabbage, or lettuce. Across the various crops, effluent qualities, and viral decay rates considered, the annual risk of infection ranged from 10 −3 to 10 −1 when reclaimed-water irrigation ceased 1 day before harvest and from 10 −9 to 10 −3 when it ceased 2 weeks before harvest. Two previously published decay coefficients were used to describe the die-off of viruses in the environment. For all combinations of crop type and effluent quality, application of the more aggressive decay coefficient led to annual risks of infection that satisfied the commonly propounded benchmark of ≤10 −4 , i.e., one infection or less per 10,000 people per year, providing that 14 days had elapsed since irrigation with reclaimed water. Conversely, this benchmark was not attained for any combination of crop and water quality when this withholding period was 1 day. The lower decay rate conferred markedly less protection, with broccoli and cucumber being the only crops satisfying the 10 −4 standard for all water qualities after a 14-day withholding period. Sensitivity analyses on the models revealed that in nearly all cases, variation in the amount of produce consumed had the most significant effect on the total uncertainty surrounding the estimate of annual infection risk. The models presented cover what would generally be considered to be worst-case scenarios: overhead irrigation and consumption of vegetables raw. Practices such as subsurface, furrow, or drip irrigation and postharvest washing/disinfection and food preparation could substantially lower risks and need to be considered in future models, particularly for developed nations where these extra risk reduction measures are more common.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal
PATTERSON, H. D., & THOMPSON, R. (1971) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/58.3.545 · Cited by 4,058
Konz, J. J., Lisi, K., Friebele, E., & Dixon, D. (1989) · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · Cited by 2,219
Surveillance for waterborne-disease outbreaks--United States, 1993-1994.
Kramer, M. H., Herwaldt, B. L., Craun, G. F., Calderon, R. L., & Juranek, D. D. (1996) · PubMed · Cited by 2,059
Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment
(2012) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_226419 · Cited by 1,040
Reuse of effluent water—benefits and risks
Toze, S. (2006) · Agricultural Water Management · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2005.07.010 · Cited by 698
Quantitative risk assessment for Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ground beef hamburgers
Cassin, M. H., Lammerding, A. M., Todd, E. C. D., et al. (1998) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(98)00028-2 · Cited by 449
Ward, R. L., Bernstein, D. I., Young, E. C., Sherwood, J. R., Knowlton, D. R., & Schiff, G. M. (1986) · Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/154.5.871 · Cited by 407
The Beta Poisson Dose‐Response Model Is Not a Single‐Hit Model
Teunis, P. F. M., & Havelaar, A. H. (2000) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/0272-4332.204048 · Cited by 381
Wastewater use in irrigated agriculture: confronting the livelihood and environmental realities
(2004) · CABI Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1079/9780851998237.0000 · Cited by 337
Waste Water Reclamation and Reuse
Asano, T. (2000) · Cited by 213
Cited by
Wastewater Irrigation: The State of Play
Hamilton, A. J., Stagnitti, F., Xiong, X., Kreidl, S. L., Benke, K. K., & Maher, P. (2007) · Vadose Zone Journal · doi:10.2136/vzj2007.0026 · Cited by 281
Self-citationIrrigation Waters as a Source of Pathogenic Microorganisms in Produce: A Review
Pachepsky, Y., Shelton, D. R., McLain, J. E. T., Patel, J., & Mandrell, R. E. (2011) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-386473-4.00002-6 · Cited by 258
Dalahmeh, S. S., Lalander, C., Pell, M., Vinnerås, B., & Jönsson, H. (2016) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/jam.13273 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamilton, A. J., Stagnitti, F., Premier, R., Boland, A.-M., & Hale, G.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3284-3290
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2167563446
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 10.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Models for Consumption of Raw Vegetables Irrigated with Reclaimed Water. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.72.5.3284-3290.2006
- The paper
- Hamilton, A. J., Stagnitti, F., Premier, R., Boland, A.-M., & Hale, G. (2006). Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Models for Consumption of Raw Vegetables Irrigated with Reclaimed Water. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.72.5.3284-3290.2006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.