The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polymyxins Revisited
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: The global emergence of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli has spurred a renewed interest in polymyxins. Once discarded due to concerns regarding nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity, polymyxins now hold an important role in the antibiotic armamentarium. However, more reliable information is needed to determine the optimal dosing of these agents. Also, unanswered questions regarding in vitro testing remain, including questions regarding the reliability of automated systems and the establishment of appropriate breakpoints for defining susceptibility. Most contemporary clinical studies examining the use of these agents have involved patients with infections due to multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii strains. It has been reassuring that polymyxin therapy for resistant bacteria has resulted in clinical responses and toxicity rates similar to those for carbapenem therapy for susceptible isolates. While most surveillance studies demonstrated high rates of susceptibility, several reports noted the emergence of polymyxin-resistant nosocomial pathogens. Polymyxins have assumed an important antibiotic niche for therapy for hospital-acquired infections; further studies defining the optimal use of these agents will likely extend the duration of their clinical usefulness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lo-Ten-Foe, J. R., de Smet, A. M. G. A., Diederen, B. M. W., Kluytmans, J. A. J. W., & van Keulen, P. H. J. (2007) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01406-06 · Cited by 242
Cited by
Meneguetti, B. T., Machado, L. D. S., Oshiro, K. G. N., Nogueira, M. L., Carvalho, C. M. E., & Franco, O. L. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.02136 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Landman, D., Georgescu, C., Martin, D. A., & Quale, J.
- Venue
- Clinical Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 449-465
- ISSN
- 0893-8512 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6618
- OpenAlex
- W4211056710
- Cited by
- 565
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polymyxins Revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cmr.00006-08
- The paper
- Landman, D., Georgescu, C., Martin, D. A., & Quale, J. (2008). Polymyxins Revisited. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00006-08
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.