Cited by 242Antibiotic Resistance in BacteriaBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy

Comparative Evaluation of the VITEK 2, Disk Diffusion, Etest, Broth Microdilution, and Agar Dilution Susceptibility Testing Methods for Colistin in Clinical Isolates, Including Heteroresistant Enterobacter cloacae and Acinetobacter baumannii Strains

Open access
Lo-Ten-Foe, Jerome R., de Smet, Anne Marie G. A., Diederen, Bram M. W., Kluytmans, Jan A. J. W., van Keulen, Peter H. J.·2007·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

Increasing antibiotic resistance in gram-negative bacteria has recently renewed interest in colistin as a therapeutic option. The increasing use of colistin necessitates the availability of rapid and reliable methods for colistin susceptibility testing. We compared seven methods of colistin susceptibility testing (disk diffusion, agar dilution on Mueller-Hinton [MH] and Isosensitest agar, Etest on MH and Isosensitest agar, broth microdilution, and VITEK 2) on 102 clinical isolates collected from patient materials during a selective digestive decontamination or selective oral decontamination trial in an intensive-care unit. Disk diffusion is an unreliable method to measure susceptibility to colistin. High error rates and low levels of reproducibility were observed in the disk diffusion test. The colistin Etest, agar dilution, and the VITEK 2 showed a high level of agreement with the broth microdilution reference method. Heteroresistance for colistin was observed in six Enterobacter cloacae isolates and in one Acinetobacter baumannii isolate. This is the first report of heteroresistance to colistin in E. cloacae isolates. Resistance to colistin in these isolates seemed to be induced upon exposure to colistin rather than being caused by stable mutations. Heteroresistant isolates could be detected in the broth microdilution, agar dilution, Etest, or disk diffusion test. The VITEK 2 displayed low sensitivity in the detection of heteroresistant subpopulations of E. cloacae . The VITEK 2 colistin susceptibility test can therefore be considered to be a reliable tool to determine susceptibility to colistin in isolates of genera that are known not to exhibit resistant subpopulations. In isolates of genera known to (occasionally) exhibit heteroresistance, an alternative susceptibility testing method capable of detecting heteroresistance should be used.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.01406-06

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • E-test results significantly correlate with MIC values obtained through broth or agar dilution methods.

    “studies have shown a significant correlation between E-test results and MIC values obtained through broth or agar dilution methods [69, 70].”

    From Methods for screening and evaluation of antimicrobial activity: A review of protocols, advantages, and limitations (2024) · cites this paper as [69]

    The Results (page not supplied) report relatively high agreement between Etest and broth microdilution for colistin susceptibility testing, with exceptions among heteroresistant isolates. They do not report a direct Etest–agar dilution comparison or a statistical test establishing that the correlation was significant. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [18]SFM Antibiogram Committee. 2003. Comite de l'Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie report 2003. Int. J. Antimicrob Agents. 21:364-391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lo-Ten-Foe, J. R., de Smet, A. M. G. A., Diederen, B. M. W., Kluytmans, J. A. J. W., & van Keulen, P. H. J.
Affiliations
  • Laboratory for Microbiology and Infection Control, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
  • Perioperative and Emergency Care, Utrecht Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Amphia Ziekenhuis (NL)
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
2007-10
Volume
51
Issue
10
Pages
3726-3730
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W2142419984
Cited by
242
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Keywords
colistin, colistin susceptibility testing, heteroresistance, Enterobacter cloacae, Acinetobacter baumannii, disk diffusion, E-test, broth microdilution, agar dilution, VITEK 2, selective decontamination of the digestive tract, intensive care unit, Gram-negative bacteria, antibiotic resistance
MeSH terms
Acinetobacter Infections, Agar, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacterial Infections, Colistin, Cross Infection, Culture Media, Enterobacteriaceae Infections, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Polymyxin B, Enterobacter cloacae, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial, Acinetobacter baumannii

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review