The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cryptosporidiosis
Open accessAbstract
Before 1982, only eight case reports of human cryptosporidiosis and fewer than 30 papers on Cryptosporidium spp. appeared in the biomedical literature. At that time, cryptosporidiosis was thought to be an infrequent infection in animals and rarely an opportunistic infection in humans. The concept of Cryptosporidium spp. as pathogens has changed dramatically within the past 8 years because of improved diagnostic techniques, increased awareness within the biomedical community, and the development of basic research programs in numerous laboratories. Presently, greater than 1,000 publications including over 400 case reports in the biomedical literature address Cryptosporidium spp. and cryptosporidiosis. Cryptosporidium parvum is now thought to be one of the three most common enteropathogens causing diarrheal illness in humans worldwide, especially in developing countries. It is likely that cryptosporidiosis was previously included in the 25 to 35% of diarrheal illness with unknown etiology. Because of the severity and length of diarrheal illness and because no effective therapy has been identified, cryptosporidiosis is one of the most ominous infections associated with AIDS. The role of C. parvum as an enteropathogen is well established; documentation of its role as a cause of hepatobiliary and respiratory diseases is now appearing in the literature. Our present understanding of the natural history, epidemiology, biology, and immunology of Cryptosporidium spp. as well as the clinical features, pathogenicity, and treatment of cryptosporidiosis are reviewed here.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Waterborne transmission of protozoan parasites: Review of worldwide outbreaks – An update 2004–2010
Baldursson, S., & Karanis, P. (2011) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.10.013 · Cited by 789
Natural pathogens of laboratory mice, rats, and rabbits and their effects on research
Baker, D. G. (1998) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.11.2.231 · Cited by 394
The role of companion animals in the emergence of parasitic zoonoses
Robertson, I. D., Irwin, P. J., Lymbery, A. J., & Thompson, R. C. A. (2000) · International Journal for Parasitology · doi:10.1016/s0020-7519(00)00134-x · Cited by 353
Cryptosporidium in humans and animals—a one health approach to prophylaxis
Ryan, U., Zahedi, A., & Paparini, A. (2016) · Parasite Immunology · doi:10.1111/pim.12350 · Cited by 258
Enteric parasitic zoonoses of domesticated dogs and cats
Robertson, I. D., & Thompson, R. C. (2002) · Microbes and Infection · doi:10.1016/s1286-4579(02)01607-6 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Current, W. L., & Garcia, L. S.
- Venue
- Clinical Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1991-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 325-358
- ISSN
- 0893-8512 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6618
- OpenAlex
- W4211126199
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cryptosporidiosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cmr.4.3.325
- The paper
- Current, W. L., & Garcia, L. S. (1991). Cryptosporidiosis. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.4.3.325
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.