The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Current perspectives on glycopeptide resistance
Open accessAbstract
In the last 5 years, clinical isolates of gram-positive bacteria with intrinsic or acquired resistance to glycopeptide antibiotics have been encountered increasingly. In many of these isolates, resistance arises from an alteration of the antibiotic target site, with the terminal D-alanyl-D-alanine moiety of peptidoglycan precursors being replaced by groups that do not bind glycopeptides. Although the criteria for defining resistance have been revised frequently, the reliable detection of low-level glycopeptide resistance remains problematic and is influenced by the method chosen. Glycopeptide-resistant enterococci have emerged as a particular problem in hospitals, where in addition to sporadic cases, clusters of infections with evidence of interpatient spread have occurred. Studies using molecular typing methods have implicated colonization of patients, staff carriage, and environmental contamination in the dissemination of these bacteria. Choice of antimicrobial therapy for infections caused by glycopeptide-resistant bacteria may be complicated by resistance to other antibiotics. Severe therapeutic difficulties are being encountered among patients infected with enterococci, with some infections being untreatable with currently available antibiotics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Arthur, M., Molinas, C., & Courvalin, P. (1992) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.174.8.2582-2591.1992 · Cited by 338
Sussman, J. I., Baron, E. J., Goldberg, S. M., Kaplan, M. H., & Pizzarello, R. A. (1986) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/clinids/8.5.771 · Cited by 139
Cited by
Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci
Cetinkaya, Y., Falk, P., & Mayhall, C. G. (2000) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.13.4.686 · Cited by 1,163
Demonstration of safety of probiotics—A review
Salminen, S. (1998) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(98)00128-7 · Cited by 884
The emergence of antibiotic resistance by mutation
Woodford, N., & Ellington, M. J. (2007) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01492.x · Cited by 417
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Woodford, N., Johnson, A. P., Morrison, D., & Speller, D. C.
- Venue
- Clinical Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 585-615
- ISSN
- 0893-8512 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6618
- OpenAlex
- W2107326429
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current perspectives on glycopeptide resistance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cmr.8.4.585
- The paper
- Woodford, N., Johnson, A. P., Morrison, D., & Speller, D. C. (1995). Current perspectives on glycopeptide resistance. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.8.4.585
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.