The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mechanism of coaggregation between Actinomyces viscosus T14V and Streptococcus sanguis 34
Open accessAbstract
Actinomyces viscosus T14V and Streptococcus sanguis 34 coaggregate by a mechanism which is not inhibited by 1 M NaCl, is dextran independent, requires calcium, is pH dependent with an optimum at pH 8.0 to 8.5, and appears to require the interaction of a protein or glycoprotein on A. viscosus with a carbohydrate on S. sanguis. The coaggregation is inhibited more than 80% by 0.01 M lactose, 0.02 M beta-methyl-D-galactoside, or 0.05 M D-galactose; inhibition of coaggregation was less than 10% in 0.1 M alpha-methyl-D-galactoside, melibiose, maltose, cellobiose, sucrose, and a number of monosaccharides. At very high concentrations of enzyme, protease from S. griseus destroyed the reactive site on A. viscosus but not on S. sanguis. Both were totally resistant to dextranase. Periodate (0.01 M; pH 4) inactivated both bacteria. The ability of S. sanguis to coaggregate with A. viscosus was not destroyed by phenol-water extraction at 65 degrees C for 15 min. When the bacteria were cultured under specified conditions, the coaggregation was highly reproducible. Under the same conditions, T14AV, the avirulent mutant of A. viscosus T14V, did not coaggregate with S. sanguis 34. Electron microscopic studies of coaggregates, labeled immunochemically with antibody to A. viscosus, indicated that fibrils on A. viscosus may be involved in the coaggregation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biology, immunology, and cariogenicity of Streptococcus mutans
Hamada, S., & Slade, H. D. (1980) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.44.2.331-384.1980 · Cited by 1,907
Communication among Oral Bacteria
Kolenbrander, P. E., Andersen, R. N., Blehert, D. S., Egland, P. G., Foster, J. S., & Palmer, R. J. (2002) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.66.3.486-505.2002 · Cited by 1,022
Bacterial interactions and successions during plaque development
Kolenbrander, P. E., Palmer, R. J., Rickard, A. H., Jakubovics, N. S., Chalmers, N. I., & Diaz, P. I. (2006) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0757.2006.00187.x · Cited by 791
Bacterial coaggregation: an integral process in the development of multi-species biofilms
Rickard, A. H., Gilbert, P., High, N. J., Kolenbrander, P. E., & Handley, P. S. (2003) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0966-842x(02)00034-3 · Cited by 765
Cisar, J. O., Kolenbrander, P. E., & McIntire, F. C. (1979) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.24.3.742-752.1979 · Cited by 494
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- McIntire, F. C., Vatter, A. E., Baros, J., & Arnold, J.
- Venue
- Infection and Immunity
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1978-09
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 978-988
- ISSN
- 0019-9567 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5522
- OpenAlex
- W2107923138
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanism of coaggregation between Actinomyces viscosus T14V and Streptococcus sanguis 34. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/iai.21.3.978-988.1978
- The paper
- McIntire, F. C., Vatter, A. E., Baros, J., & Arnold, J. (1978). Mechanism of coaggregation between Actinomyces viscosus T14V and Streptococcus sanguis 34. Infection and Immunity. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.21.3.978-988.1978
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.