The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Adherence of slime-producing strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis to smooth surfaces
Open accessAbstract
Slime production is not a generally recognized feature of Staphylococcus epidermidis. In a recent outbreak of S. epidermidis intravascular catheter-associated sepsis, we noted that 63% of clinically implicated strains grew as a slimy film coating the culture tube walls when propagated in tryptic soy broth. Only 37% of randomly collected blood culture contaminants and skin isolates demonstrated a similar phenomenon (p less than 0.05). Transmission electron micrographs of these coating bacteria showed them to be encased in an extracellular matrix that stained with alcian blue. Slime production was most evident in autoclaved media containing Casamino Acids and glucose supplementation (0.25% wt/vol). There were strain and media preparation variability of slime production in the presence of other carbohydrates. Some strains were not able to produce slime under any of the tested conditions. The production or nonproduction of slime did not influence growth rate. When grown in vitro, slime producers accumulated on the surface of intravascular catheters as macrocolonies, whereas non-slime, producers did not. Transmission and scanning electron micrographs showed slime producers to be encased in an adhesive layer on the catheter surface, whereas nonproducers were not encased. These results suggest that slime-mediated adherence may be a critical factor in the pathogenesis of S. epidermidis infections of medical devices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ceri, H., Olson, M. E., Stremick, C., Read, R. R., Morck, D., & Buret, A. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.37.6.1771-1776.1999 · Cited by 2,155
Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci
Becker, K., Heilmann, C., & Peters, G. (2014) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00109-13 · Cited by 1,628
Bacterial adhesion: seen any good biofilms lately
Dunne, W. M. (2002) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.15.2.155-166.2002 · Cited by 1,516
Critical review on biofilm methods
Azeredo, J., Azevedo, N. F., Briandet, R., Cerca, N., Coenye, T., Costa, A. R., Desvaux, M., Di Bonaventura, G., Hébraud, M., Jaglic, Z., et al. (2017) · Critical Reviews in Microbiology · doi:10.1080/1040841x.2016.1208146 · Cited by 1,045
Nickel, J. C., Ruseska, I., Wright, J. B., & Costerton, J. W. (1985) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.27.4.619 · Cited by 889
Metadata
- Authors
- Christensen, G. D., Simpson, W. A., Bisno, A. L., & Beachey, E. H.
- Venue
- Infection and Immunity
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1982-07
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 318-326
- ISSN
- 0019-9567 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5522
- OpenAlex
- W2115135671
- Cited by
- 1,410
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adherence of slime-producing strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis to smooth surfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/iai.37.1.318-326.1982
- The paper
- Christensen, G. D., Simpson, W. A., Bisno, A. L., & Beachey, E. H. (1982). Adherence of slime-producing strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis to smooth surfaces. Infection and Immunity. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.37.1.318-326.1982
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.