The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fungistatic and fungicidal activity of human parotid salivary histidine-rich polypeptides on Candida albicans
Open accessAbstract
Human parotid saliva histidine-rich polypeptides exerted antifungal activity against Candida albicans at concentrations similar to the known antifungal activity of the imidazole antibiotics. Inhibition of both growth and viability could be demonstrated by optical density monitoring and plating assays. Inhibition of growth was observed to be greatest when the histidine-rich polypeptides were added to the inoculum before addition to the growth media. However, complete inhibition by these polypeptides was still noted during active growth at turbidities of C. albicans corresponding to 10(6) CFU/ml. At higher cell densities, growth was delayed but not halted under the experimental conditions investigated. Candidacidal activity was observed with both growing and nongrowing cells. With respect to the latter, reaction of cells in buffer with the histidine-rich polypeptides for a period of 30 min resulted in killing of greater than 90% of two different strains of C. albicans, whereas a third strain was found to be less susceptible. Moreover, the kinetics of loss of cell viability correlated with the loss of potassium from the cells. In addition to the histidine-rich polypeptides, hen egg white lysozyme, poly-L-lysine, and poly-L-histidine affected C. albicans. Both of the polyamino acids completely inhibited the growth of the yeast whereas lysozyme was not as potent. Where delays in growth were observed for all of these agents, including the histidine-rich polypeptides, turbidities reached those of untreated controls after a 24-h period. Enhanced effects were noted if C. albicans was preincubated with these agents in 0.025 2-(N-morpholino)-ethanesulfonic acid buffer, pH 5.2, before growth in the yeast synthetic medium.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Human Antimicrobial Peptides: Defensins, Cathelicidins and Histatins
De Smet, K., & Contreras, R. (2005) · Biotechnology Letters · doi:10.1007/s10529-005-0936-5 · Cited by 560
Salivary Proteins: Protective and Diagnostic Value in Cariology?
van Nieuw Amerongen, A., Bolscher, J. G. M., & Veerman, E. C. I. (2004) · Caries Research · doi:10.1159/000077762 · Cited by 473
Saliva-Bacterium Interactions in Oral Microbial Ecology
Scannapieco, F. A. (1994) · Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine · doi:10.1177/10454411940050030201 · Cited by 328
Kuipers, M. E., de Vries, H. G., Eikelboom, M. C., Meijer, D. K. F., & Swart, P. J. (1999) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.43.11.2635 · Cited by 148
Sialochemistry: A Diagnostic Tool?
Aguirre, A., Testa-Weintraub, L. A., Banderas, J. A., Haraszthy, G. G., Reddy, M. S., & Levine, M. J. (1993) · Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine · doi:10.1177/10454411930040031201 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Pollock, J. J., Denepitiya, L., MacKay, B. J., & Iacono, V. J.
- Venue
- Infection and Immunity
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1984-06
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 702-707
- ISSN
- 0019-9567 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5522
- OpenAlex
- W2106426214
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fungistatic and fungicidal activity of human parotid salivary histidine-rich polypeptides on Candida albicans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/iai.44.3.702-707.1984
- The paper
- Pollock, J. J., Denepitiya, L., MacKay, B. J., & Iacono, V. J. (1984). Fungistatic and fungicidal activity of human parotid salivary histidine-rich polypeptides on Candida albicans. Infection and Immunity. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.44.3.702-707.1984
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.