The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bacterial adherence to human endothelial cells in vitro
Open accessAbstract
Differences in the ability of bacteria to adhere to normal valvular endothelium may account for the predominance of particular species as pathogens in acute endocarditis. An in vitro adherence assay was developed to simulate the host surface encountered in acute bacterial endocarditis by using confluent monolayers of human endothelial cells. Adherence of 32 gram-positive and -negative blood culture isolates to this surface was compared. All five Staphylococcus aureus strains tested were highly adherent to endothelial cells, as was one gram-negative strain (Serratia marcescens). The remaining gram-positive and -negative isolates, including four viridans streptococci, were relatively nonadherent. Transmission electron microscopy demonstrated attachment of Staphylococcus aureus and invagination of the underlying endothelial cell membrane at 1 h followed by engulfment of large numbers of bacteria after 3 h. The intracellular bacteria appeared to be contained within vacuoles. Preferential attachment of some strains of bacteria, in particular Staphylococcus aureus, to human endothelial cells occurred in vitro, suggesting that adherence is an important determinant of bacterial pathogenicity in acute endocarditis. Active uptake of bacteria by endothelial cells may help account for the virulence of Staphylococcus aureus in endovascular infections and for the ability of this organism to establish multiple metastatic foci of infection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology, underlying mechanisms, and associated risks
Kluytmans, J., van Belkum, A., & Verbrugh, H. (1997) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.10.3.505 · Cited by 2,595
Pathogenesis of Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection
Gordon, R. J., & Lowy, F. D. (2008) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/533591 · Cited by 961
Self-citationSkin Microflora and Bacterial Infections of the Skin
Chiller, K., Selkin, B. A., & Murakawa, G. J. (2001) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology Symposium Proceedings · doi:10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.00043.x · Cited by 537
Staphylococcus aureus vs. Osteoblast: Relationship and Consequences in Osteomyelitis
Josse, J., Velard, F., & Gangloff, S. C. (2015) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2015.00085 · Cited by 286
In or out: Phagosomal escape of Staphylococcus aureus
Moldovan, A., & Fraunholz, M. J. (2019) · Cellular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/cmi.12997 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Ogawa, S. K., Yurberg, E. R., Hatcher, V. B., Levitt, M. A., & Lowy, F. D.
- Venue
- Infection and Immunity
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1985-10
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 218-224
- ISSN
- 0019-9567 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5522
- OpenAlex
- W2165937459
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial adherence to human endothelial cells in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/iai.50.1.218-224.1985
- The paper
- Ogawa, S. K., Yurberg, E. R., Hatcher, V. B., Levitt, M. A., & Lowy, F. D. (1985). Bacterial adherence to human endothelial cells in vitro. Infection and Immunity. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.50.1.218-224.1985
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.