Production, characterization, and antibody specificity of a mouse monoclonal antibody reactive with Cryptococcus neoformans capsular polysaccharide
Open accessAbstract
Two monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 antibodies reacting with Cryptococcus neoformans capsular polysaccharide (CNPS) were produced in mice by using a carefully defined procedure for immunization with unmodified CNPS purified from C. neoformans serotype A. Since the antibodies were found to have the same pattern of specificity, only one of them (E1) is described. This anti-CNPS monoclonal antibody reacted with the glucuronoxylomannan component of CNPS but not with the constituent monosaccharides or with the mannose alpha(1----3)-linked oligosaccharide structures present on CNPS. E1 appeared to be specific for C. neoformans serotype A by agglutination of whole cells; it was specific for soluble CNPS A by gel immunoprecipitation. However, indirect immunofluorescence and competitive-binding enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay experiments showed low levels of cross-reactivity with serotypes B and D but not with serotype C. Concentrations 10,000 times higher for serotypes B and D cells than for serotype A cells were required for a 50% inhibition of E1 anti-CNPS A activity as measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Among the other yeasts tested, a cross-reaction was only detected with Trichosporon beigelii. The four serotypes of C. neoformans could be distinguished based on intensities and patterns of fluorescence in an indirect immunofluorescence assay using the monoclonal anti-CNPS A antibody. Monoclonal anti-CNPS A antibodies could be useful for fundamental studies on the glucuronoxylomannan structure, as well as for clinical applications such as serotyping and possibly the serological diagnosis of cryptococcosis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A monoclonal antibody specific for the C. neoformans polysaccharide capsule was protective against cryptococcal infection in mice.
“In addition to cell-mediated immunity, pioneering work established that a monoclonal antibody specific for the C. neoformans polysaccharide capsule was protective against cryptococcal infection in mice126,127.”
From Treatment strategies for cryptococcal infection: challenges, advances and future outlook (2021) · cites this paper as [127]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 128
- Authors
- Dromer, F., Salamero, J., Contrepois, A., Carbon, C., & Yeni, P.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Infection and Immunity
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1987-03
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 742-748
- ISSN
- 0019-9567 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5522
- PMC
- PMC260404
- OpenAlex
- W1824251371
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 10 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Infection and Immunity (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
- Keywords
- Cryptococcus neoformans, capsular polysaccharide, monoclonal antibodies, glucuronoxylomannan, serotyping, serotype A, serotype B, serotype D, serotype C, Trichosporon beigelii, cryptococcosis, serological diagnosis, antibody cross-reactivity, immunization
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antibodies, Fungal, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Cryptococcus, Cryptococcus neoformans, Hybridomas, Latex Fixation Tests, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Inbred C3H, Polysaccharides, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review